Heparin-coated versus non-coated surfaces for extracorporeal circulation

Studies were made to compare completely heparin-bonded (HBS) and conventional extracorporeal circulation surfaces using capillary membrane oxygenators (CMO) in sheep and dogs for up to five days. The aims were: to investigate the need for systemic heparinization in the case of heparin-coated surfaces, to assess blood compatibility and gas exchange performance of both systems and the extent of complement activation, and to find solutions for plasma leakage by the use of CMO. All studies were performed under standardized conditions, such as drugs, surgery, priming, blood flow rate etc. For heparin-coated surface studies all blood interfaces (CMO, catheters, tubes, etc) were coated. It was possible to eliminate systemic heparinization totally when HBS were used. During the five-day non-heparin application period blood coagulation parameters were almost unchanged and in the physiological range, platelets did not drop below 80%, hemolysis was negligible and gas exchange performance was unaffected. Less complement activation occurred with HBS than with non-coated surfaces.