Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests

Mei-Yin Polley1, Ying Kuen Cheung

  • 1US Clinical Development Biostatistics, Amgen Inc., 1120 Veterans Blvd, Mailstop ASF21-2, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA. meic@amgen.com

Biometrics
|June 19, 2007
PubMed

Insights

This study introduces two-stage designs for early phase dose-finding clinical trials, optimizing sample size for monotone biologic endpoints. These designs reduce average sample size by up to 38% while maintaining statistical accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Early phase dose-finding trials aim to identify the minimum effective dose (MED) for drugs.
  • Traditional stepwise testing procedures are often single-stage, potentially leading to larger sample sizes.
  • Monotone biologic endpoints, such as serum levels or gene expression, are common in these trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend stepwise testing to a two-stage enrollment plan for dose-finding trials.
  • To reduce sample size requirements through early stopping of unpromising doses (futility interim).
  • To evaluate the performance of four proposed two-stage designs.

Main Methods:

  • Development and examination of four novel two-stage dose-finding trial designs.
  • Application of these designs to a hypothetical statin trial with four doses and a placebo.
  • Calibration of design parameters and discussion of implementation strategies.

Main Results:

  • A calibrated two-stage design reduced the average total sample size by 38% (from 125 to 78) compared to a one-stage test.
  • Error rates and probability of correct selection were maintained comparably.
  • The maximum total sample size slightly increased from 125 to 130.

Conclusions:

  • Two-stage designs offer significant average sample size reductions in early phase dose-finding trials.
  • These designs provide an efficient alternative to traditional one-stage methods for monotone biologic endpoints.
  • The trade-off for reduced average sample size is a marginal increase in the maximum sample size.

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...