Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays
Published on: February 21, 2020
Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests
Mei-Yin Polley1, Ying Kuen Cheung
1US Clinical Development Biostatistics, Amgen Inc., 1120 Veterans Blvd, Mailstop ASF21-2, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA. meic@amgen.com
Abstract:
We deal with the design problem of early phase dose-finding clinical trials with monotone biologic endpoints, such as biological measurements, laboratory values of serum level, and gene expression. A specific objective of this type of trial is to identify the minimum dose that exhibits adequate drug activity and shifts the mean of the endpoint from a zero dose to the so-called minimum effective dose. Stepwise test procedures for dose finding have been well studied in the context of nonhuman studies where the sampling plan is done in one stage. In this article, we extend the notion of stepwise testing to a two-stage enrollment plan in an attempt to reduce the potential sample size requirement by shutting down unpromising doses in a futility interim. In particular, we examine four two-stage designs and apply them to design a statin trial with four doses and a placebo in patients with Hodgkin's disease. We discuss the calibration of the design parameters and the implementation of these proposed methods. In the context of the statin trial, a calibrated two-stage design can reduce the average total sample size up to 38% (from 125 to 78) from a one-stage step-down test, while maintaining comparable error rates and probability of correct selection. The price for the reduction in the average sample size is the slight increase in the maximum total sample size from 125 to 130.
Insights
This study introduces two-stage designs for early phase dose-finding clinical trials, optimizing sample size for monotone biologic endpoints. These designs reduce average sample size by up to 38% while maintaining statistical accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Early phase dose-finding trials aim to identify the minimum effective dose (MED) for drugs.
- Traditional stepwise testing procedures are often single-stage, potentially leading to larger sample sizes.
- Monotone biologic endpoints, such as serum levels or gene expression, are common in these trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend stepwise testing to a two-stage enrollment plan for dose-finding trials.
- To reduce sample size requirements through early stopping of unpromising doses (futility interim).
- To evaluate the performance of four proposed two-stage designs.
Main Methods:
- Development and examination of four novel two-stage dose-finding trial designs.
- Application of these designs to a hypothetical statin trial with four doses and a placebo.
- Calibration of design parameters and discussion of implementation strategies.
Main Results:
- A calibrated two-stage design reduced the average total sample size by 38% (from 125 to 78) compared to a one-stage test.
- Error rates and probability of correct selection were maintained comparably.
- The maximum total sample size slightly increased from 125 to 130.
Conclusions:
- Two-stage designs offer significant average sample size reductions in early phase dose-finding trials.
- These designs provide an efficient alternative to traditional one-stage methods for monotone biologic endpoints.
- The trade-off for reduced average sample size is a marginal increase in the maximum sample size.
More Related Videos
08:58Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
Published on: October 17, 2025
09:41An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Clinical Trials: Overview