Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computerized endoscopic reporting is no more time-consuming than reporting with conventional methods.

Jagdiesh K Soekhoe1, Marcel J M Groenen, Astrid M van Ginneken

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Ikazia Hospital, Montessoriweg 1, 3083 AN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

European Journal of Internal Medicine
|June 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lessons learned: the importance of timely recognition of verrucous squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2026
Same author

Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Post-Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Inflammatory intestinal diseases·2025
Same author

Ten Year Follow-Up After Explantation of the Duodenal-jejunal Bypass Liner.

Obesity surgery·2025
Same author

Enhancing the safety and quality of paediatric endoscopy in the Netherlands.

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2025
Same author

Efficacy of Endoscopic Sutured Gastroplasty on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2-A Systematic Review.

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism·2025
Same author

Mucosal α4β7+ Lymphocytes and MAdCAM+ Venules Predict Response to Vedolizumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Inflammatory bowel diseases·2023
Same journal

Why rare uninformative findings appear highly specific.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence in diagnostics and medical decision making.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of euvolemic hyponatremia among geriatric hospitalised patients.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Sex-based differences and clinical outcomes in older adults with Candida bloodstream infection: a post-hoc secondary analysis of a multicentre study.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Have mediators and at-risk time shaped the Lipoprotein(a)-dementia null? Author's reply.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Using latent class analysis for identifying clinical phenotypes associated with prognosis in patients with atrial high-rate episodes.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Computerized endoscopy reports take nearly the same time as handwritten or dictated reports. Computerized reports offer structured data storage for analysis, unlike dictated reports.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Endoscopists utilize various methods for gastrointestinal endoscopy reporting, including handwritten, dictated, and computerized systems.
  • Report generation time is a critical factor in evaluating the efficiency and acceptance of different reporting methods.
  • Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting system is essential for optimizing clinical workflows.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the time efficiency of different gastrointestinal endoscopy report writing methods.
  • To evaluate the time taken for report composition and transmission across handwritten, dictated, and computerized systems.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study was conducted across three endoscopy departments.
  • Investigators recorded the time required to compose and send reports using handwritten, free-text dictated, and pre-defined computerized methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The time to describe specific endoscopic diagnoses was analyzed for each system.

    • Main Results:

    • Handwritten reports averaged 113 seconds.
    • Free-text dictated reports took 65 seconds for the endoscopist, plus 172 seconds for a typist.
    • Pre-defined computerized reports were completed in an average of 86 seconds.

    Conclusions:

    • Computerized, pre-defined endoscopy reports can be generated in comparable timeframes to handwritten and dictated reports.
    • While both dictated and computerized reports integrate with hospital information systems, only computerized reports offer structured data storage for statistical analysis.
    • The structured database of computerized reports facilitates advanced data analysis and research capabilities.