Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?

Thomas R Zentall1, Rebecca A Singer

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA. zentall@uky.edu

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|June 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The freedom to choose may be an artifact of a preference for spatial location.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same author

Episodic memory: Rats can remember the context.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Episodic memory in animals?

Translational neuroscience·2025
Same author

Ephemeral reward task: Why is it so difficult for pigeons to learn it?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Peter Urcuioli's lasting contribution: Animal memory research and an important model of stimulus class formation.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

Training Does Not Uniformly Increase Canine Self-Control.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025

Replication failures in pigeon studies may stem from insufficient training, not necessarily a Type I error. Sufficient training is crucial for reliably observing within-trial contrast effects in pigeons.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral psychology
  • Animal cognition
  • Comparative psychology

Background:

  • The study addresses a replication failure of within-trial contrast effects in pigeons.
  • Vasconcelos et al. (2007) failed to replicate Clement et al. (2000) findings, suggesting a Type I error.

Discussion:

  • The authors argue that the replication failure is not due to a Type I error.
  • Insufficient training duration in the Vasconcelos et al. study may have prevented reliable observation of the effect.
  • Existing evidence supports the existence of the within-trial contrast effect.

Key Insights:

  • The reliability of within-trial contrast effects in pigeons is dependent on adequate training.
  • Replication challenges can arise from methodological variations, such as training duration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The original findings by Clement et al. (2000) are considered valid despite replication issues.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research should focus on establishing optimal training parameters for observing contrast effects.
    • Future studies should carefully control training duration to ensure reliable results.
    • This work highlights the importance of training in behavioral research with animal models.