Related Experiment Videos

Income inequalities and self-reported maternal health status: cross-sectional national survey

S Petrou1, E Kupek, R Gray

  • 1National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. stavros.petrou@npeu.ox.ac.uk

The objective of this study was to examine income inequalities in the self-reported health status of women during the postnatal period. We analysed data from a cohort of 18,523 birth mothers of children who participated in the Millennium Cohort Study. Data on income and self-reported health status were collected during face-to-face interviews conducted at 9 months postpartum. Total take-home household income from employment, government and other sources was estimated and equivalised to reflect household composition, while self-reported health status was converted into a dichotomous measure. Complex survey logistic regression models were used to explore the association between equivalised household income and fair or poor self-reported health status. Compared with mothers with equivalised household income in the first quintile (bottom 20%) of the income distribution, mothers in the third (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.81), fourth (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.38-0.50) and fifth (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.27-0.37) quintiles had a decreased likelihood of reporting fair or poor health status (P < 0.001). However, following adjustment for other predictors of postnatal health status, only mothers with equivalised household income in the fifth quintile (top 20%) had a decreased likelihood of reporting fair or poor health status (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.58-0.90; P = 0.004). We conclude that this study provides support for the existence of an income gradient for postnatal health status. Efforts to reduce income inequalities in adverse maternal health outcomes are likely to require macro and microeconomic initiatives.

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Development of the Oral Microbiota01:28

Development of the Oral Microbiota

The establishment of the oral microbiome begins before birth, challenging the long-held belief that the fetal oral cavity is sterile. The presence of oral microbes such as Streptococcus and Fusobacterium in amniotic fluid suggests that microbial exposure may occur in utero, potentially through translocation from the maternal oral or gastrointestinal tract. This early colonization primes the neonatal immune system and sets the stage for subsequent microbial succession. Maternal health,...
Dimensions of Health and Illness01:21

Dimensions of Health and Illness

The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...