Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

06:37
Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
Published on: September 17, 2021
Comparative study on methodology in molecular dynamics simulation of nucleation.
Jan Julin1, Ismo Napari, Hanna Vehkamäki
1Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
The Journal of Chemical Physics
|June 22, 2007
Summary
Simulations show the Andersen thermostat provides more accurate gas-liquid nucleation rates than the Berendsen thermostat. Nucleation rate calculations using the Yasuoka-Matsumoto method yield higher values than direct observation.
Area of Science:
- Thermodynamics
- Statistical Mechanics
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Gas-liquid nucleation is a fundamental process in physical chemistry.
- Accurate simulation of nucleation requires reliable temperature control and rate determination methods.
- Previous studies have utilized various thermostats and nucleation rate calculation techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of the Berendsen and Andersen thermostats in simulating gas-liquid nucleation.
- To evaluate different methods for obtaining nucleation rates from simulation data.
- To analyze the behavior of atomic and cluster velocities during nucleation.
Main Methods:
- Simulations of 1000 Lennard-Jones atoms using the Berendsen and Andersen thermostats.
- Analysis of atomic and cluster velocities using the Maxwell velocity distribution.
- Extraction of nucleation rates via direct observation and the Yasuoka-Matsumoto method.
Main Results:
- The Berendsen thermostat struggled to control temperature for clusters exceeding critical size.
- Both thermostats yielded velocities consistent with the Maxwell distribution for individual atoms and small clusters.
- The Andersen thermostat produced nucleation rates approximately twice as high as the Berendsen thermostat.
- The Yasuoka-Matsumoto method yielded nucleation rates three times higher than direct observation.
Conclusions:
- The Andersen thermostat is more suitable for simulating gas-liquid nucleation compared to the Berendsen thermostat.
- The choice of nucleation rate calculation method significantly impacts the obtained results.
- Maxwell velocity distribution accurately describes particle velocities in the simulated system.

