Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rhythmicity and Trait Absorption Are Linked to Nonordinary States of Consciousness.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

Neural adaptation in brain responses to vocal and emotional sounds in school-age children.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Bilingual Exposure and Sex Shape Developmental Trajectories of Brain Responses to Speech-Sound Features in Infants.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Neural encoding of speech in noise: Effects of background noise and behavioral correlates.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

The effect of spatial structures on analogical problem solving.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Frequency-Following Response in Infants With Congenital Syphilis.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Individual differences in sequence learning and auditory pattern sensitivity as revealed with evoked potentials.

Elisabet Tubau1, Carles Escera, Vanessa Carral

  • 1Department of Basic Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. etubau@ub.edu

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|June 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Explicit learners, who develop explicit knowledge for motor sequences, exhibit enhanced auditory rhythm perception. This suggests differences in auditory processing may underlie individual variations in learning motor sequences.

More Related Videos

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Learning

Background:

  • Individual differences in motor sequence acquisition exist, with explicit learners performing differently than non-explicit learners.
  • Explicit learners show faster responses and distinct brain activity (event-related potentials) to sequence changes.
  • Prior research suggests explicit learners benefit from auditory action effects, hinting at a role for auditory processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if individual differences in motor sequence learning are linked to auditory rhythm perception.
  • To test the hypothesis that explicit learners have superior auditory rhythm discrimination abilities.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded mismatch negativity (MMN)-evoked potentials in explicit and non-explicit sequence learners.
  • Presented auditory stimuli that violated a regular alternation pattern (low pitch, high pitch) to elicit MMN.
  • Compared MMN amplitudes between the two learner groups.

Main Results:

  • Explicit learners demonstrated a significantly larger MMN amplitude in response to auditory rhythm violations.
  • This finding supports the hypothesis that auditory rhythm perception differs between explicit and non-explicit learners.
  • The results indicate a potential neural basis for individual differences in motor sequence learning.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in motor sequence acquisition may be partly explained by variations in auditory rhythm perception.
  • Enhanced MMN in explicit learners suggests a stronger neural response to auditory pattern violations.
  • These findings offer new insights into the mechanisms underlying sequential action control and individual learning differences.