Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants.

Zachary M Smith¹, Bertrand Delgutte

¹Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. zsmith@alum.mit.edu

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

|June 22, 2007

Summary

Bilateral cochlear implants aim to improve hearing by using both ears. This study found that while the brainstem can process timing differences crucial for sound localization, performance in humans is often poor, suggesting neural plasticity may be a factor.

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Self-doped and planar nitrogen-bay-functionalized perylene diimides: unravelling structure-property relationships.

Chemical science·2025

Same author

Dysregulation of Protein Kinase CaMKI Leads to Autism-Related Phenotypes in Synaptic Connectivity, Sleep, Sociality, and Aging-Dependent Degeneration in <i>Drosophila</i>.

Biology·2025

Same author

Complete genome sequences of <i>Streptomyces</i> phages HazuAndZazu and Tubberson.

Microbiology resource announcements·2025

Same author

Limitations on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Users: A Compilation of Viewpoints.

Trends in hearing·2025

Same author

Effect of Reverberation on Neural Responses to Natural Speech in Rabbit Auditory Midbrain: No Evidence for a Neural Dereverberation Mechanism.

eNeuro·2023

Same author

Neural coding of dichotic pitches in auditory midbrain.

Journal of neurophysiology·2023

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Auditory Neuroscience
Bioengineering

Background:

Bilateral cochlear implantation aims to leverage binaural processing for enhanced auditory performance.
Human subjects with bilateral cochlear implants often show poorer interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination than normal-hearing individuals, despite ITDs being critical for sound localization and speech-in-noise perception.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate neural sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) using an animal model of bilateral cochlear implantation.
To understand the neural mechanisms underlying ITD processing with electric stimulation in the context of cochlear implants.

Main Methods:

Developed an animal model using acutely deafened, anesthetized cats with bilaterally implanted intracochlear electrodes.
Recorded single-unit activity in the inferior colliculus in response to electric current pulse trains delivered to both cochleae.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Systematically varied stimulus intensity and pulse rate to assess their effects on neural ITD sensitivity.

Main Results:

A majority of inferior colliculus neurons exhibited sensitivity to electric ITDs.
Neural ITD tuning sharpness was comparable to that observed with acoustic stimulation in normal-hearing animals.
ITD sensitivity was strongly dependent on stimulus intensity and pulse rate, with optimal performance below 100 Hz.
Observed dynamic ranges of ITD sensitivity as narrow as 1 dB in some neurons.

Conclusions:

Sharp neural ITD sensitivity is achievable with electric stimulation at appropriate intensities, offering promise for restoring binaural hearing benefits.
The observed rate limitation in neural ITD sensitivity parallels behavioral deficits in bilaterally implanted humans.
Neural plasticity resulting from prior deafness and lack of binaural experience may contribute to suboptimal ITD discrimination in current bilateral cochlear implant users.