Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity: what contributes to dissemination by state health
Ross C Brownson1, Paula Ballew, Brian Dieffenderfer
1Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA. brownson@slu.edu
Background:
Evidence-based guidelines for promoting physical activity have been produced, yet sparse information exists on the dissemination of effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to better understand the dissemination of physical activity interventions across the United States, focusing particularly on evidence-based guidelines.
Design:
A cross-sectional study was conducted in the U.S. that was organized around a modified version of the diffusion of innovations theory.
Setting/Participants:
Respondents (n=49) were the physical activity contact person (e.g., program administrator, health educator) in each state or territorial health department.
Main Outcome Measures:
Seven specific programs and policies relating to physical activity intervention were examined as dependent variables. Five additional domains--organizational climate, awareness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance--framed a set of independent variables.
Results:
The most important factor related to decision making was the availability of adequate resources. Most respondents (89.8%) were aware of evidence-based guidelines to promote physical activity. However, less than half of the respondents (41%) had the authority to implement evidence-based programs and policies. A minority of respondents reported having support from their state governor (35.4%) or from most of their state legislators (21.3%). Several key factors were associated with the adoption of evidence-based interventions, including the presence of state funding for physical activity, whether the respondent participated in moderate physical activity, presence of adequate staffing, and presence of a supportive state legislature.
Conclusions:
Awareness of the importance of promoting physical activity is relatively high in state and territorial health departments; however, the levels of internal support within the health department appear to outweigh any outside support from elected officials.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
