Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A

Katharina Delhusen Carnahan1, Marianne Arner, Gunnar Hägglund

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden. katharina.delhusen-carnahan@skane.se

Insights

Gross motor function and manual ability in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) are often different. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) help describe these differences in CP subgroups.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Neurology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Cerebral Palsy (CP) affects motor function in children.
  • The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) assesses gross motor skills.
  • The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) evaluates manual abilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the association between gross motor function and manual ability in children with CP.
  • To analyze these associations across different CP diagnostic subtypes.

Main Methods:

  • A population-based study included 365 children with CP (born 1992-2001) in southern Sweden.
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels were assessed.
  • CP diagnosis and subtype were confirmed by a neuropaediatrician.

Main Results:

  • A weak overall correlation was found between GMFCS and MACS.
  • Significant discrepancies were observed in spastic hemiplegia (lower manual ability) and spastic diplegia (lower gross motor function).
  • Children with dyskinetic CP showed significant limitations in both domains without discrepancy.

Conclusions:

  • Gross motor function and manual ability are frequently discrepant in children with CP.
  • The GMFCS and MACS are valuable tools for a comprehensive clinical assessment.
  • These classification systems aid in population-based studies and clinical practice for CP.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos