Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metastable biocompatibility: a new approach.

David Williams1

  • 1Clinical Engineering Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK. dfw.ce@liverpool.ac.uk

Medical Device Technology
|June 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural repair by NT3-chitosan via enhancement of endogenous neurogenesis after adult focal aspiration brain injury.

Biomaterials·2017
Same author

<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> adaptation and diversification in the non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis lung.

The European respiratory journal·2017
Same author

Engagement of the medical-technology sector with society.

Science translational medicine·2017
Same author

A Nomogram for Calculation of Maximum Recommended Dose by Volume of Local Anesthetic in Pediatric Dentistry.

Pediatric dentistry·2017
Same author

Osteoporosis, obesity, and sarcopenia on abdominal CT: a review of epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies for the reporting radiologist.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2017
Same author

Chronic Granulomatous Disease Presenting as Aspergillus Fumigatus Pneumonia in a Previously Healthy Young Woman.

The American journal of case reports·2017

Biocompatibility, crucial for medical devices, is better understood as a temporary, metastable state rather than a permanent one. This perspective helps explain long-term implant failures in medical technology.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Engineering
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Biocompatibility is essential for the success of implantable medical devices.
  • Current understanding often treats biocompatibility as a static, stable condition.
  • Failures in long-term implants suggest limitations in this view.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reframe the concept of biocompatibility from a stable state to a metastable state.
  • To explore the implications of this metastable concept for understanding implant performance.
  • To investigate the causes of biocompatibility failures in long-term medical devices.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of biocompatibility.
  • Review of long-term implantable medical device literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case studies of biocompatibility failures.

    • Main Results:

    • Biocompatibility is dynamic and can change over time.
    • A metastable state model better explains device performance fluctuations.
    • Environmental and biological factors contribute to shifts from metastable states.

    Conclusions:

    • Viewing biocompatibility as a metastable state provides a more accurate framework for biomaterial performance.
    • This perspective is critical for designing more reliable long-term implantable medical devices.
    • Understanding metastability aids in predicting and mitigating biocompatibility failures.