Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Holger Thiele1, Richard W Smalling, Gerhard C Schuler
1Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig--Heart Center, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. thielh@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Insights
Cardiogenic shock (CS) from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has high mortality. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer active circulatory support, potentially improving outcomes for patients unresponsive to standard treatments like intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), leading to significant mortality.
- Intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) is a standard initial therapy but offers limited hemodynamic support, especially in severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.
- Existing treatments may be insufficient for patients with profound LV dysfunction and persistent CS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current clinical experience with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in patients with CS complicating AMI.
- To evaluate the potential benefits of active circulatory support provided by LVADs in refractory CS.
- To assess the role of LVADs as an alternative or adjunct to IABP in severe AMI-induced CS.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical data on the use of percutaneous LVADs in CS patients.
- Analysis of hemodynamic outcomes and clinical efficacy of LVADs in the context of AMI-related CS.
- Comparison of LVAD support with conventional therapies, including IABP, in managing severe CS.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous LVADs provide active circulatory support, addressing limitations of IABP in severe LV dysfunction.
- Early application of LVADs may improve hemodynamic stability and reverse CS in non-responders to standard therapy.
- Data on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous LVADs in this specific patient population are emerging.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous LVADs represent a promising therapeutic option for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, particularly in patients failing conventional management.
- Active circulatory support from LVADs may offer superior hemodynamic benefits compared to devices like IABP.
- Further research and larger studies are warranted to establish the definitive role of percutaneous LVADs in the treatment algorithm for AMI-induced CS.
Abstract:
Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the most common cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition to percutaneous coronary intervention, inotropes, and fluids, intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is most widely used for initial haemodynamic stabilization. However, the main limitation of IABP is the lack of active circulatory support and the requirement of a certain level of left ventricular (LV) function. In many patients with severe depression of LV function, haemodynamic support and LV unloading derived from IABP is insufficient to reverse CS. The use of percutaneous LV assist devices (LVAD) with active circulatory support might be beneficial in CS patients not responding to standard treatment including IABP support. This review reports the current experience of percutaneous LVAD in CS complicating AMI.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care