Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experimental validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm.

Karen Breitman1, Satyapal Rathee, Chris Newcomb

  • 1Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|June 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Comparative evaluation of 4DCT and 4DCBCT for motion and volume measurement accuracy in a dynamic phantom.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same author

Competency-Based Simulation and Evaluation in Medical Education: Clinical Decision Making and Reference Dosimetry.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

Simulation training in radiation oncology.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2025
Same author

Adjuvant radiotherapy alone, an effective treatment option for early-stage low- risk breast cancer in women over 50: results from a population based cohort study using a Canadian provincial database.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2025
Same author

Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections.

Nature medicine·2024
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

This study validated a new photon-beam dose calculation algorithm (AAA) in a treatment planning system (TPS). The algorithm showed good performance, meeting TG-53 criteria for most clinical beam geometries and phantom measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Dosimetry

Background:

  • Accurate photon-beam dose calculation is critical for effective radiation therapy planning.
  • Established treatment planning systems (TPS) require rigorous validation of new dose calculation algorithms.
  • The analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) is a newly released algorithm for photon-beam dose calculation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in a treatment planning system (TPS).
  • To compare AAA calculations against measurements in water phantoms and anthropomorphic phantoms.
  • To assess AAA's accuracy according to TG-53 criteria and compare it with a previous convolution-superposition algorithm.

Main Methods:

  • Compared AAA-calculated dose profiles and total scatter factors (TSF) with measurements for Varian linear accelerators (6-MV and 15-MV beams).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized TG-53 evaluation criteria for dose profiles in a water phantom across various beam geometries.
  • Performed TLD and ion chamber measurements in Rando and CIRS inhomogeneous phantoms, respectively, comparing with AAA-calculated doses.

    • Main Results:

    • Over 96% of points passed TG-53 criteria for dose profiles in most regions, with minor discrepancies attributed to beam data matching.
    • Mean difference between measured and calculated total scatter factors (TSF) was <0.5%, though wedge cases showed >1% difference.
    • Mean difference between measured and calculated doses in inhomogeneous phantoms was 2.1% (5.3% max), within TG-53 guidelines.

    Conclusions:

    • The analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) demonstrates good accuracy for photon-beam dose calculations, meeting established clinical evaluation criteria.
    • AAA performance is comparable to previous algorithms, providing a reliable option for treatment planning.
    • Minor deviations highlight the importance of precise beam data commissioning for optimal accuracy.