Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Global tests in the additive hazards regression model.

Axel Gandy1, Terry M Therneau, Odd O Aalen

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.gandy@imperial.ac.uk

Statistics in Medicine
|June 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Operationalizing diffusion magnetic resonance imaging positivity for detection of vascular contributions to impairment and dementia.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

An Overview and Recent Developments in the Analysis of Multistate Processes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Modelling the temporal evolution of plasma p-tau217, amyloid PET, tau PET and cognition.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Time-Dependent Mediators in Survival Analysis: Graphical Representation of Causal Assumptions.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Lifetime and 10-year absolute risk of cognitive impairment in relation to amyloid PET severity: a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study.

The Lancet. Neurology·2025
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new, consistent test for additive hazards regression models, extending the logrank test. It addresses inconsistencies found in previous methods for comparing groups in survival analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • The additive hazards regression model is crucial for analyzing time-to-event data.
  • Existing global tests for comparing groups, like Aalen's ad hoc weight function, have shown inconsistencies.
  • These inconsistencies arise from the baseline group dependency of the test statistic.

Discussion:

  • This article proposes a novel, consistent alternative test for the additive hazards model.
  • The suggested test is a natural extension of the widely used logrank test.
  • An alternative covariance estimator is also discussed to improve model robustness.

Key Insights:

  • The new test effectively addresses the baseline group dependency issue in global tests.
  • The proposed method offers a more reliable approach for comparing groups in survival data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulation studies and real-world data application validate the test's performance.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research can explore extensions of this test to more complex survival models.
    • The developed methods can enhance the accuracy of covariate effect testing in various fields.
    • This work contributes to robust statistical inference in survival data analysis.