Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Odour sampling 1: Physical chemistry considerations.

N Hudson1, G A Ayoko

  • 1International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO 2434, Brisbane Queensland 4001, Australia. neale.hudson@dpi.qld.gov.au

Bioresource Technology
|June 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MitoTam induces ferroptosis and increases radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer cells.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2024
Same author

The representation of medical risks and incentives concerning egg donation: an analysis of the websites of fertility clinics of Belgium, Spain and the UK.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2024
Same author

To gate or not to gate: Revisiting drinking water microbial assessment through flow cytometry fingerprinting.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

Dose-dependent expression of claudin-5 is a modifying factor in schizophrenia.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure.

Environment international·2017
Same author

A qualitative study of the impact of endometriosis on male partners.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2017
Same journal

Identification and characterisation of a novel polyesterase from Coniochaeta pulveracea CAB 683 and its synergistic potential in bioplastic hydrolysis.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same journal

In‑situ stripping by water‑ethanol steam improves continuous conversion of corncob hydrolysate to furfural.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same journal

Transcription factor YALI1_A16891g contributes to enhanced glycolytic flux and mevalonate production at elevated temperature in engineered Yarrowia lipolytica.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same journal

Expanding the horizon of bio-naphtha beyond gasoline blend: property characterization and conversion opportunity assessment through techno-economic and life-cycle analyses.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same journal

Microalgae harvesting via thermoresponsive polymers: Insights into poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) efficacy and mechanisms.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same journal

Discovering hidden candidate plastic-degrading enzymes: Combined multi-omics and machine learning strategy.

Bioresource technology·2026
See all related articles

Choosing the right odour sampling device is crucial. Different devices yield different emission rates, impacting odour sample composition and analysis accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Atmospheric Chemistry

Background:

  • Odour sampling is critical for environmental monitoring and source characterization.
  • The choice of sampling device can significantly alter the collected odour sample's composition.
  • Limited research exists comparing emission rates from different types of odour sampling devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different odour sampling devices affect odour sample composition.
  • To compare emission rates obtained from turbulent versus quiescent sampling devices.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for selecting appropriate odour sampling methods.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of emission rates from turbulent and quiescent odour sampling devices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of odour sample composition influenced by device selection.
  • Evaluation of physical and chemical principles in odour sampling.

    • Main Results:

    • Emission rates derived from turbulent and quiescent sampling devices were found to be significantly different.
    • The selection of an odour sampling device demonstrably influences the composition of the odour sample.
    • Current odour sampling practices may not adequately consider device-specific impacts.

    Conclusions:

    • Greater consideration of fundamental physical and chemical principles is needed in odour sampling.
    • The nature of the odour source and sampling device conditions are critical factors.
    • Careful device selection is essential to ensure the accuracy and appropriateness of odour sampling results.