Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
Relationship between insertion/deletion (indel) frequency of proteins and essentiality
Simon K Chan1, Michael Hsing, Fereydoun Hormozdiari
1CIHR/MSFHR Strategic Training Program in Bioinformatics, Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. sichan@bcgsc.ca <sichan@bcgsc.ca>
Essential proteins in pathogens show higher frequencies of insertions/deletions (indels) compared to non-essential proteins. These indels may play a role in protein interactions and offer new avenues for drug design.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Structural Biology
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- Previous studies identified sizable insertions/deletions (indels) in essential pathogenic proteins compared to human proteins.
- These indels create spatial differences, enabling selective targeting of pathogen proteins.
- This led to the development of selective antibodies and compounds against pathogen proteins.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if indels are more prevalent in essential proteins than non-essential proteins.
- To explore the potential of indels as targets for selective drug development.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of protein essentiality data from Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
- Statistical analysis (t-tests) to compare indel frequencies in essential vs. non-essential proteins.
- Modeling indel abundance using Weibull distribution and evaluating discrimination power with ROC curves.
- Analysis of protein interaction data and network properties (betweenness centrality) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Main Results:
- Essential proteins exhibited significantly higher mean indel frequencies than non-essential proteins across the three species.
- Indel abundance followed a Weibull distribution but indel frequency alone was insufficient for accurate discrimination.
- Indel-bearing proteins in S. cerevisiae were more interactive and central in protein interaction networks.
Conclusions:
- Indels are non-randomly distributed, favoring essential and highly connected proteins.
- Insertions/deletions likely influence protein-protein interactions and their regulation.
- Findings support the utility of indels in bioinformatics and cheminformatics for novel drug design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER
Integral transmembrane proteins possess transmembrane and extra membrane domains. The transmembrane domains are primarily made of 20-25 hydrophobic amino acids arranged in a helical secondary confirmation. These...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order to...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein.

