Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

The Placebo Effect

The Placebo Effect

The placebo effect occurs when people's expectations or beliefs influence or determine their experience in a given situation. In other words, simply expecting something to happen can actually make it happen.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Xenotransplantation: Injustice, Harm, and Alternatives for Addressing the Organ Crisis.

The Hastings Center report·2025

Same author

Individual difference factors that predict evaluations and acceptance of authorized concealment for the reduction of nocebo side effects.

Patient education and counseling·2025

Same author

Clinical trials are not the solution to inequities in cancer care.

Gynecologic oncology·2025

Same author

Are Patients With Cancer Best Managed in a Clinical Trial?

JAMA·2024

Same author

The Use of Authorized Concealment to Minimize Nocebo Side Effects: A Survey of US Public Attitudes.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2023

Same author

Ethical Outreach for Rural Cancer Care in the United States: Balancing Access With Optimal Clinical Outcomes.

JCO oncology practice·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants

Published on: December 14, 2014

Placebo-controlled procedural trials for neurological conditions.

Sam H Horng¹, Franklin G Miller

¹Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Neurotherapeutics : the Journal of the American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics

|June 30, 2007

Summary

Ethical debates surrounding invasive placebo controls, like sham surgery, in neurological disease research are complex. Balancing subject risk and deception against methodological needs is crucial for valid study outcomes.

More Related Videos

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants

Published on: December 14, 2014

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

Area of Science:

Neurology
Medical Ethics
Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

Invasive placebo controls, particularly sham surgery, are central to ethical debates in neurological disease research.
The use of deception and inherent risks to participants necessitate careful ethical consideration.
Methodological needs to control for bias and placebo effects must be weighed against these risks.

Purpose of the Study:

To review a framework for the ethical assessment of sham surgery in neurological research.
To address special issues related to invasive placebo interventions for neurological conditions.

Main Methods:

Review of existing ethical frameworks and literature.
Analysis of specific challenges in neurological research contexts.
Examination of factors influencing risk and methodological validity.

Main Results:

Growing evidence of expectation and conditioning effects in neurological diseases complicates placebo control.
Increasing scale of risk associated with various invasive placebo interventions.
Cross-over designs present unique ethical and methodological considerations.

Conclusions:

A robust ethical framework is essential for sham surgery in neurological research.
Careful consideration of expectation, conditioning, risk, and study design is required.
Balancing participant safety with scientific rigor remains a key challenge.