Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

04:35
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
A disattenuated correlation estimate when variables are measured with error: illustration estimating cross-platform
K J Archer1, C I Dumur, G S Taylor
1Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 East Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23298, U.S.A. kjarcher@vcu.edu
Statistics in Medicine
|June 30, 2007
Summary
This study introduces measurement error models to estimate gene-specific correlations, improving clone prioritization for sequence verification. The novel
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Cross-platform reproducibility studies commonly use Pearson's correlation to assess gene expression consistency.
- Existing methods may not adequately account for measurement error inherent in different platforms.
- Reliability in gene expression data is crucial for accurate analysis and clone selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose measurement error models for estimating gene-specific correlations in cross-platform studies.
- To demonstrate the utility of gene-specific reliability estimates for prioritizing clones.
- To introduce a 'disattenuated' correlation method for studies with measurement error.
Main Methods:
- Application of measurement error models to estimate gene-specific correlations.
- Development of gene-specific reliability estimates.
- Comparison of proposed method with traditional Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Main Results:
- Measurement error models provide a more accurate estimation of gene-specific correlations.
- Gene-specific reliability estimates effectively prioritize clones for sequence verification.
- The 'disattenuated' correlation offers a robust measure when both variables are subject to error.
Conclusions:
- Measurement error models offer a superior approach to assessing cross-platform reproducibility in gene expression studies.
- Gene-specific reliability is a valuable metric for clone selection, outperforming random sampling.
- The proposed 'disattenuated' correlation is applicable to various scientific fields involving measurements with error.
Related Concept Videos
Correlation and Regression
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a negative...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...
Correlations
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
Coefficient of Correlation
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
Correlation of Experimental Data
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...
Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation
Microsoft Excel is a powerful tool for statistical analysis, including calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two continuous variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient, often denoted as "r," ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, meaning as one variable increases, the other does too. A value close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation, implying that as one...