Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Shared decision-making in Australia.

Kirsten J Mccaffery1, Heather L Shepherd, Lyndal Trevena

  • 1School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. kirstenm@health.usyd.edu.au

Zeitschrift Fur Arztliche Fortbildung Und Qualitatssicherung
|July 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Managing Asthma Well and Sustainably - Patient Perspectives Explored.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same author

A Scalability Assessment of an Organizational Health Literacy Initiative to Support Health Professionals in Developing Quality Consumer Information.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same author

Development of a question prompt list to support Consent for Genomic Testing (CoGenT) and research.

Human genetics·2026
Same author

Psychosocial impacts of spontaneous and medically induced premature ovarian insufficiency and early menopause: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Maturitas·2026
Same author

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion From the Start: Reforming Australia's Research Infrastructure for Inclusive Participation.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same author

Safeguarding Quality in Health and Medical Science Information Today.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

[QUALIFY--a tool for assessing quality indicators].

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung·2008
Same journal

[Implementation of a quality management system for research and teaching in a university department of epidemiology].

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung·2008
Same journal

[The quality of CME questions as a component part of continuing medical education--an empirical study].

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung·2008
Same journal

[Communication training using "standardized parents" for paediatricians--structured competence-based training within the scope of continuing medical education].

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung·2008
Same journal

[Working on the ward as part of the medical school curriculum: the influence of final year students on learning outcomes of medical students in their 7th semester and their feeling integrated].

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung·2008
Same journal

[The "bad news consultation assessment scale" (Aufklärungsgesprächbewertungsskala, AGBS): a tool for assessing communication competencies when breaking bad news to cancer patients].

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung·2008
See all related articles

Shared decision-making (SDM) is recognized as important in Australian healthcare, but lacks a clear policy framework and resources for implementation. Future efforts should educate consumers to increase demand for SDM.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Consumer Health Informatics

Background:

  • Shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly recognized as a crucial component of patient-centered care within diverse healthcare systems.
  • The Australian healthcare system comprises both public and private sectors, influenced by national and regional policies.
  • Existing support for SDM in Australia includes guidelines and interventions, yet a comprehensive policy framework is absent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the current status and challenges of implementing shared decision-making (SDM) within the Australian healthcare system.
  • To identify barriers to SDM at macro, meso, and micro levels of healthcare delivery.
  • To highlight the need for a balanced approach addressing both the supply and demand sides of SDM implementation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • This paper presents a descriptive analysis of the current state of SDM in Australia.
  • It synthesizes information on existing policies, guidelines, and interventions related to SDM.
  • Barriers at various levels of the healthcare system are identified and discussed.

Main Results:

  • While SDM is acknowledged as important, Australia lacks a clear overarching policy framework and strategic plan for its implementation.
  • Limited resources and infrastructure hinder the widespread adoption of SDM.
  • Current initiatives primarily focus on the supply side (providers), with a recognized need to also address the demand side (consumers).

Conclusions:

  • Effective implementation of SDM in Australia is constrained by a lack of cohesive policy, resources, and infrastructure.
  • A dual approach targeting both healthcare providers and consumers is necessary for successful SDM integration.
  • Educating consumers to actively seek information and participate in decision-making is a critical next step to enhance SDM.