Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current
Eberhard Grube1, Gerhard Schuler, Lutz Buellesfeld
1HELIOS Heart Center Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany. GrubeE@aol.com
Insights
Percutaneous CoreValve implantation effectively treats severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. This procedure offers a feasible alternative with lower mortality than predicted by risk scores.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis requires treatment, especially in high-risk or inoperable patients.
- Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) is an emerging alternative therapy.
- The CoreValve prosthesis offers a solution for patients unsuitable for traditional surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the procedural performance and safety of the second (21-French) and third (18-French) generation CoreValve prosthesis.
- To assess the feasibility of percutaneous aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.
- To compare outcomes between the two generations of the CoreValve device.
Main Methods:
- A total of 86 patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis were included.
- Patients met specific criteria based on age, logistic EuroSCORE, and additional risk factors.
- The study compared outcomes for the 21-French and 18-French CoreValve devices, noting the transition to a less invasive approach with the 18-F device.
Main Results:
- Acute device success was 88%, with a procedural success rate of 74%.
- Successful implantation significantly reduced aortic transvalvular gradients (43.7 mm Hg pre-procedure to 9.0 mm Hg post-procedure).
- Procedural mortality was 6%, with an overall 30-day mortality of 12% and a combined death, stroke, and myocardial infarction rate of 22%.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous CoreValve implantation is a feasible treatment for severe aortic valve stenosis in high-risk patients.
- The procedure is associated with a lower mortality rate than predicted by established risk algorithms.
- The 18-French device facilitated a transition to a less invasive percutaneous approach.
Objectives:
We sought to determine both the procedural performance and safety of percutaneous implantation of the second (21-French [F])- and third (18-F)-generation CoreValve aortic valve prosthesis (CoreValve Inc., Irvine, California).
Background:
Percutaneous aortic valve replacement represents an emerging alternative therapy for high-risk and inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
Methods:
Patients with: 1) symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis (area <1 cm2); 2) age > or =80 years with a logistic EuroSCORE > or =20% (21-F group) or age > or =75 years with a logistic EuroSCORE > or =15% (18-F group); or 3) age > or =65 years plus additional prespecified risk factors were included. Introduction of the 18-F device enabled the transition from a multidisciplinary approach involving general anesthesia, surgical cut-down, and cardiopulmonary bypass to a truly percutaneous approach under local anesthesia without hemodynamic support.
Results:
A total of 86 patients (21-F, n = 50; 18-F, n = 36) with a mean valve area of 0.66 +/- 0.19 cm2 (21-F) and 0.54 +/- 0.15 cm2 (18-F), a mean age of 81.3 +/- 5.2 years (21-F) and 83.4 +/- 6.7 years (18-F), and a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 23.4 +/- 13.5% (21-F) and 19.1 +/- 11.1% (18-F) were recruited. Acute device success was 88%. Successful device implantation resulted in a marked reduction of aortic transvalvular gradients (mean pre 43.7 mm Hg vs. post 9.0 mm Hg, p < 0.001) with aortic regurgitation grade remaining unchanged. Acute procedural success rate was 74% (21-F: 78%; 18-F: 69%). Procedural mortality was 6%. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 12%; the combined rate of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction was 22%.
Conclusions:
Treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis in high-risk patients with percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve prosthesis is feasible and associated with a lower mortality rate than predicted by risk algorithms.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
