Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and

Catherine Wilburn1, Aidan Feeney

  • 1Department of Psychology, Queen's Campus Durham University, Thornaby, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland TS17 6BH, United Kingdom. c.j.wilburn@durham.ac.uk

Cognition
|July 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counterfactual relief.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

The roles of switching and inhibition in adult counterintuitive scientific thinking.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Working across religions, cultures, settings, and development: Protocol for wave 2 data collection with children and parents by the developing belief network.

PloS one·2025
Same author

An experimental investigation of the effects of anticipating regret and relief on intentions and decisions to get the influenza vaccination.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same author

Debt-related regret and well-being in people resolving problem debts.

BMC psychology·2025
Same author

Testicular self-examination: The role of anticipated relief and anticipated regret.

British journal of health psychology·2024
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Children show better memory for generalized items than adults, suggesting different generalization strategies. However, this study indicates that developmental differences in generalization may not be necessary, challenging prior conclusions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Previous research suggested children and adults use distinct inductive generalization strategies.
  • Adults were thought to rely on category membership, while children use perceptual similarity.
  • This was linked to children's enhanced recognition memory due to detailed processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of processing time in children's memory and generalization.
  • To challenge the conclusion that children and adults employ fundamentally different generalization mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Measured children's and adults' viewing times for stimulus items.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed children's inference accuracy and subsequent memory with limited item inspection time (250ms).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Children spent longer viewing stimulus items than adults.
  • Limited inspection time (250ms) reduced children's memory for items, despite accurate inferences.
  • Reduced memory under time constraints suggests processing depth, not strategy, influences memory.

Conclusions:

  • Children's enhanced memory may be attributed to longer processing times, not a different generalization strategy.
  • Developmental differences in generalization strategies are not definitively supported by prior findings.
  • Findings question the necessity of distinct developmental pathways for generalization and memory.