Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex- and age- specific lung cancer incidence and mortality among Medicaid beneficiaries with and without HIV, 2001-2015.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

Association of Comorbid and Incident Depression and Other Mental Health Conditions With Long-COVID: Results From the Johns Hopkins COVID Long Study.

Journal of medical virology·2026
Same author

Incidence of frailty-related fracture among Medicaid beneficiaries living with HIV and cancer: A cohort study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Practice facilitation to implement stepped care for unhealthy alcohol use in HIV clinics: study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.

Addiction science & clinical practice·2026
Same author

Differences in utilization, complications, and mortality after cancer surgery by HIV status among Medicaid beneficiaries from 2001-2021.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Assessing the risk of early-onset dementia within 5 years of cancer diagnosis Running Title: Early-onset dementia after cancer diagnosis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Interval and clinical cohort studies: epidemiological issues.

Bryan Lau1, Stephen J Gange, Richard D Moore

  • 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. blau1@jhmi.edu

AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
|July 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Clinical cohort studies, using electronic medical records, are increasingly common. This research compares them to traditional interval cohort designs, discussing the pros and cons of each for health research.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Cohort studies are vital for medical research, with clinical cohort designs leveraging electronic medical records (EMRs) becoming more prevalent.
  • The HIV research setting has successfully employed clinical cohort designs, tracking participants through their regular healthcare access.
  • A gap exists in comparing the established interval cohort design with the emerging clinical cohort design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between clinical cohort and interval cohort study designs.
  • To analyze the inherent advantages and disadvantages of each cohort design.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate cohort methodologies in medical research.

Main Methods:

  • Distinguishing features of clinical cohort studies (clinic-based, EMR-driven) and interval cohort studies (time-based, independent of healthcare access).
  • Comparative analysis of methodological strengths and weaknesses for each design.
  • Literature review and conceptual framework development.

Main Results:

  • Clinical cohort studies offer real-time data capture and reflect actual healthcare utilization.
  • Interval cohort studies provide controlled follow-up but may miss nuances of patient care.
  • Both designs have unique biases and benefits depending on the research question.

Conclusions:

  • The choice between clinical and interval cohort designs depends on research objectives, data availability, and desired insights.
  • Understanding the distinctions is crucial for robust epidemiological study design and interpretation.
  • Advancements in health informatics are facilitating the growth and utility of clinical cohort studies.