Percutaneous coronary intervention and the no-reflow phenomenon
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
William J van Gaal1, Adrian P Banning
1Department of Cardiology, Level 2, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. bill.vangaal@conted.ox.ac.uk
Insights
No-reflow, a complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), often occurs in specific high-risk procedures. Preventing distal embolization is key, as refractory no-reflow significantly increases mortality risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- No-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- It is most frequently observed in saphenous vein graft interventions, rotational atherectomy, and primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
- The underlying causes, including distal embolization and ischemia/reperfusion injury, vary across these clinical scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the pathogenesis, prevention, and management of the no-reflow phenomenon in PCI.
- To highlight the importance of prevention strategies in high-risk patient groups.
- To differentiate treatment approaches based on the cause of no-reflow.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on the no-reflow phenomenon in PCI.
- Analysis of contributing factors such as distal embolization and ischemia/reperfusion injury.
- Evaluation of current prevention and treatment strategies.
Main Results:
- Prevention of distal embolization using antiplatelet agents, vasodilators, or mechanical devices is the primary strategy in high-risk PCI.
- Pharmacologic treatment is the mainstay for established no-reflow once mechanical causes are ruled out, targeting microvascular obstruction.
- Refractory no-reflow is associated with a substantially higher risk of 30-day mortality compared to transient no-reflow.
Conclusions:
- Proactive prevention of distal embolization is crucial for managing no-reflow during PCI.
- Effective treatment of established no-reflow relies on pharmacologic interventions targeting microvascular dysfunction.
- Understanding the varying contributions of embolization and ischemia/reperfusion is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and reducing mortality.
Abstract:
No-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is observed most commonly during saphenous vein graft intervention, rotational atherectomy and primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The contributions of distal embolization and ischemia/reperfusion injury to the pathogenesis of no-reflow vary in these settings, as does prevention and management. Prevention of no-reflow in these high-risk groups is the best treatment strategy, employing antiplatelet agents, vasodilators and/or mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization. Once mechanical factors are excluded as a cause for reduced epicardial flow, the treatment of established no-reflow is mainly pharmacologic, since the obstruction occurs at the level of the microvasculature. Compared with patients in whom no-reflow is transient, refractory no-reflow is associated with a markedly increased risk of 30-day mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

