Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization.

Jason M Highsmith1, Luis M Tumialán, Gerald E Rodts

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Neurosurgical Focus
|July 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing those Most Satisfied versus Least Satisfied Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Are there Differences in Baseline Characteristics?

Spine·2026
Same author

Predictors of long-term myelopathy relief in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy following surgery: a Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Is patient satisfaction static at 5 years after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

What is the average time frame of clinically meaningful improvement in surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data: 5-year follow-up.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Is baseline Neck Disability Index a predictor of 5-year postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Is cervical disc arthroplasty noninferior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Letter to the Editor. Enhancing comparability in idiopathic intracranial hypertension research through standardized outcome measures.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Introduction. Contemporary spinal arthroplasty.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Cervical disc arthroplasty as a safe and effective procedure for obese patients.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Comparing the operational metrics and functional outcomes of lumbar arthroplasty implants: a systematic review.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Long-term reoperation risk after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a level-matched meta-analysis of FDA investigational device exemption studies and international randomized trials.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Total disc replacement versus lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
See all related articles

Rigid spinal fusion can cause adjacent-segment disease. Posterior dynamic stabilization using polyetheretherketone rods may minimize this complication by reducing stress on adjacent spinal segments.

Area of Science:

  • Spine surgery
  • Orthopedic biomechanics
  • Spinal instrumentation

Background:

  • Lumbar fusion rates are high, leading to increased adjacent-segment disease.
  • Rigid spinal fixation causes supraphysiological stress on adjacent discs and facets.
  • Adjacent-segment disease may necessitate further surgical intervention.

Observation:

  • Dynamic stabilization implants and disc arthroplasty are alternatives to rigid fixation.
  • Current motion-preserving technologies have limited applications.
  • Semirigid stabilization aims to mimic bone's elasticity.

Findings:

  • Posterior dynamic stabilization with polyetheretherketone rods offers a semirigid construct.
  • This approach may reduce adjacent-level forces compared to rigid fixation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Initial experiences suggest dynamic stabilization may minimize adjacent-segment disease.

    • Implications:

    • Posterior dynamic stabilization presents a potential alternative for spinal fusion.
    • This technique could reduce the incidence of adjacent-segment disease.
    • Further research is needed to establish the full scope and efficacy of dynamic stabilization.