Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models
Torben Martinussen1, Odd O Aalen, Thomas H Scheike
1Department of Natural Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. tma@life.ku.dk
Abstract:
The Cox hazards model (Cox, 1972, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B34, 187-220) for survival data is routinely used in many applied fields, sometimes, however, with too little emphasis on the fit of the model. A useful alternative to the Cox model is the Aalen additive hazards model (Aalen, 1980, in Lecture Notes in Statistics-2, 1-25) that can easily accommodate time changing covariate effects. It is of interest to decide which of the two models that are most appropriate to apply in a given application. This is a nontrivial problem as these two classes of models are nonnested except only for special cases. In this article we explore the Mizon-Richard encompassing test for this particular problem. It turns out that it corresponds to fitting of the Aalen model to the martingale residuals obtained from the Cox regression analysis. We also consider a variant of this method, which relates to the proportional excess model (Martinussen and Scheike, 2002, Biometrika 89, 283-298). Large sample properties of the suggested methods under the two rival models are derived. The finite-sample properties of the proposed procedures are assessed through a simulation study. The methods are further applied to the well-known primary biliary cirrhosis data set.
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Hazard Rate
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Relative Risk
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

