Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences01:20

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences

Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) is a highly selective and sensitive technique for accurate elemental analysis. Though the analysis of ICP–MS mass spectra is comparatively straightforward, it is affected by spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic interferences. Spectroscopic interferences arise when the plasma contains ionic species with an m/z value the same as the analyte ion. Spectroscopic interference can be categorized as isobaric, polyatomic ions, and refractory oxide ion...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference

Interference leads to systematic error in atomic absorption (AA) measurements by enhancing or diminishing the analytical signal or the background. These interferences can be grouped into three main categories: spectral interference, chemical interference, and physical interference.
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hilbert phase microscopy based on pseudo thermal illumination in the Linnik configuration.

Optics letters·2023
Same author

DeepOrientation: convolutional neural network for fringe pattern orientation map estimation.

Optics express·2022
Same author

Photogrammetry-Based Volume Measurement Framework for the Particle Density Estimation of LECA.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Common-path intrinsically achromatic optical diffraction tomography.

Biomedical optics express·2021
Same author

Author Correction: Variational Hilbert Quantitative Phase Imaging.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Variational Hilbert Quantitative Phase Imaging.

Scientific reports·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

Analysis of systematic errors in spatial carrier phase shifting applied to interferogram intensity modulation

Adam Styk1, Krzysztof Patorski

  • 1Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland. a.styk@mchtr.pw.edu.pl

Applied Optics
|July 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a simplified spatial carrier phase shifting interferometry method for decoding two-beam interferogram intensity modulation. The technique offers advantages in single-frame recording and data processing for analyzing vibrating microelements.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements
09:36

Continuous-Wave Propagation Channel-Sounding Measurement System - Testing, Verification, and Measurements

Published on: June 25, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Optical Metrology
  • Interferometry
  • Micro-element Analysis

Background:

  • Traditional interferogram analysis can be complex and require specialized equipment.
  • Decoding intensity modulation in two-beam interferograms is crucial for precise measurements.
  • Systematic errors often complicate fringe pattern analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a simplified method for two-beam interferogram intensity modulation decoding.
  • To analyze the impact of systematic errors on modulation distribution determination.
  • To identify an optimal calculation algorithm for fringe pattern analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Spatial carrier phase shifting interferometry for single-frame recording.
  • Automatic fringe pattern analysis techniques.
  • Numerical simulations and laboratory testing of vibrating silicon microelements.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the advantages of single-frame recording, experimental simplicity, and uncomplicated data processing.
  • Quantified the influence of spatial carrier miscalibration, nonuniform intensity profiles, and nonlinear recording.
  • Identified an optimal calculation algorithm through simulations and experimental validation.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed spatial carrier phase shifting interferometry method is effective for decoding intensity modulation.
  • The analysis provides insights into mitigating systematic errors for accurate fringe pattern analysis.
  • The method is validated for analyzing dynamic phenomena like vibrating silicon microelements.