Spinal sonography in newborns and infants - part II: spinal dysraphism and tethered cord

K-H Deeg1, H-M Lode, I Gassner

  • 1Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin Bamberg. karl-heinz.deeg2sozialstiftung-bamberg.de

Ultraschall in Der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)
|July 5, 2007
PubMed

Insights

Spinal dysraphism and tethered cord in infants can be diagnosed using ultrasound before bone ossification. This imaging technique is crucial for identifying various spinal malformations in newborns.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal imaging
  • Pediatric neurology
  • Spinal cord malformations

Background:

  • Infants with lumbo-sacral cutaneous markers or neurological deficits are at risk for spinal dysraphism and tethered cord.
  • Spinal dysraphisms are classified into open (Type I), closed (Type II), and occult (Type III) forms, all potentially associated with tethered cord.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the sonographic diagnosis of various spinal dysraphisms and tethered cord in neonates.
  • To differentiate between different types of spinal dysraphisms and associated conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Sonographic evaluation of the neonatal spine, focusing on spinal arches before complete ossification.
  • Identification of cutaneous markers, back masses, and spinal cord abnormalities.

Main Results:

  • Type I dysraphisms (e.g., meningomyelocele) and Type II (e.g., lipomyelomeningocele) present with distinct back masses.
  • Type III dysraphisms often lack a back mass but may have cutaneous markers.
  • Sonography can distinguish conditions like dermal sinus tracts, diastematomyelia, and tight filum terminale.

Conclusions:

  • Ultrasound is effective for diagnosing spinal dysraphisms and tethered cord in neonates.
  • Diagnosis is feasible as long as the spinal arches have not fully ossified.
Abstract