Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

O-Ring Aortic Banding Versus Traditional Transverse Aortic Constriction for Modeling Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Published on: October 6, 2022
Severe aortic stenosis and its association with hypertension: analysis of clinical and echocardiographic parameters
Katerina Linhartová1, Jan Filipovský, Roman Cerbák
1Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. linhartkaterina@atlas.cz
Insights
Hypertension is common in severe aortic stenosis (AS) but does not affect ascending aortic dimensions. Bicuspid aortic valve and AS severity independently predict aortic size, not hypertension history.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) and hypertension commonly cause cardiac hypertrophy and aortic dilatation.
- The combined effect on ascending aortic dimensions remains unevaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of coincident hypertension on ascending aortic dimensions in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional analysis of clinical, angiographic, and echocardiographic data.
- Included 225 patients undergoing evaluation for non-rheumatic AS.
- Compared patients with and without hypertension.
Main Results:
- Hypertension (68%) was associated with more severe dyspnea and higher coronary artery disease prevalence.
- Ascending aortic dimensions, left ventricular mass, and remodeling were similar between hypertensive and normotensive groups.
- Bicuspid aortic valve and stenosis severity independently predicted wider ascending aortic dimensions.
Conclusions:
- Hypertension is prevalent in severe AS but does not independently influence ascending aortic dimensions.
- Bicuspid aortic valve and AS severity are key determinants of ascending aortic size.
- Findings suggest focusing on valve morphology and stenosis severity for aortic dimension assessment in AS.
Background/Aims:
Aortic stenosis (AS) and hypertension are associated with cardiac hypertrophy and aortic dilatation. The effect of their coincidence on the ascending aortic dimensions has not yet been evaluated, and therefore was the aim of our study.
Methods:
We performed cross-sectional analysis of history, clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic data of consecutive patients evaluated before surgery for non-rheumatic AS.
Results:
The study sample included 225 patients (age 68+/-9 years, 60% males), with mean transaortic gradient of 55+/-17 mmHg. Hypertension was present in 153 (68%) patients. The hypertensives had more severe dyspnea (NYHA class 2.2+/-0.9 vs 1.9+/-0.9, p = 0.05) and higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (57% vs 33%, p = 0.001), but did not differ from the normotensives in the ascending aortic dimensions, the left ventricular mass, ejection fraction and remodeling patterns. Wider ascending aortic dimensions were independently associated with bicuspid aortic valve (p<0.001), and with maximal gradient in those with tricuspid aortic valve. Vasodilators were used in 84 (54%) hypertensives.
Conclusion:
We found hypertension in 68% of patients with severe AS. Bicuspid aortic valve and stenosis severity were independent predictors of ascending aortic dimensions, but not the history of hypertension and blood pressure.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

