Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regression models for method comparison data.

Graham Dunn1

  • 1Biostatistics Group, Division of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. graham.dunn@manchester.ac.uk

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|July 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The service user experience of SlowMo therapy: A co-produced thematic analysis of service users' subjective experience.

Psychology and psychotherapy·2022
Same author

The impact of moderator by confounder interactions in the assessment of treatment effect modification: a simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2022
Same author

The impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the SlowMo study: Reflections on peer innovation.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2021
Same author

Protocol for individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of patients with psychosis to investigate treatment effect modifiers for CBT versus treatment as usual or other psychosocial interventions.

BMJ open·2021
Same author

The Dunn Worry Questionnaire and the Paranoia Worries Questionnaire: new assessments of worry.

Psychological medicine·2019
Same author

Automated psychological therapy using virtual reality (VR) for patients with persecutory delusions: study protocol for a single-blind parallel-group randomised controlled trial (THRIVE).

Trials·2019
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Analyzing paired measurements from two fallible assays presents challenges due to errors-in-variables. Instrumental variable (IV) regression methods offer potential solutions, especially when combined with two-phase sampling for improved efficiency in large datasets.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Analyzing paired measurements from multiple assay methods is crucial in various scientific fields.
  • Fallible assay methods introduce errors, complicating standard regression analysis.
  • Errors-in-variables problems lack model identifiability, requiring strong assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe regression methods for analyzing paired measurements from two fallible assay methods.
  • To discuss the advantages and pitfalls of these regression techniques.
  • To explore the potential of instrumental variable (IV) methods for improving analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Regression analysis for paired, fallible measurements.
  • Discussion of identifiability issues in errors-in-variables models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application and evaluation of instrumental variable (IV) regression.
  • Introduction of two-phase sampling methods to enhance IV estimator efficiency.

    • Main Results:

    • Standard regression methods face identifiability challenges with fallible assays.
    • Instrumental variable (IV) regression demonstrates significant potential for improving analysis.
    • Two-phase sampling methods increase the efficiency of IV estimators, particularly in large samples.

    Conclusions:

    • Instrumental variable (IV) regression methods offer a promising approach to analyzing data from two fallible assay methods.
    • Careful consideration of model assumptions is necessary.
    • Two-phase sampling can enhance the statistical power and reliability of IV-based analyses.