Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Reliability and validity of a nutrition and physical activity environmental self-assessment for child care
Sara E Benjamin1, Brian Neelon, Sarah C Ball
1Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA, USA. sara_benjamin@harvardpilgrim.org
Insights
The Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) is a stable and accurate tool for evaluating child care environments. It is recommended for healthy weight interventions, though more objective measures may be needed for outcome assessment.
Area of Science:
- Child Health and Nutrition
- Public Health Interventions
- Early Childhood Education Environments
Background:
- Limited self-administered assessment tools exist for child care nutrition and physical activity environments.
- Child care settings are increasingly recognized as crucial targets for health interventions.
- A validated and reliable measure is needed to assess these environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the criterion validity, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of a self-administered environmental assessment tool for child care settings.
- To establish the accuracy and stability of the Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) instrument.
Main Methods:
- Inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing concurrent self-assessments from 59 directors and 109 staff.
- Test-retest reliability was evaluated using a sub-sample of 38 directors completing the assessment twice over three weeks.
- Criterion validity was determined by comparing self-assessments to researcher-administered assessments in 69 centers.
Main Results:
- Kappa statistics for inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.20 to 1.00 (IQR: 0.45–0.63), with percent agreement from 52.6% to 100%.
- Kappa statistics for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.07 to 1.00 (IQR: 0.27–0.45), with percent agreement from 34.3% to 100%.
- Kappa statistics for validity ranged from -0.01 to 0.79 (IQR: 0.08–0.34), with percent agreement from 12.9% to 93.7%.
Conclusions:
- The NAP SACC self-assessment demonstrates adequate stability and accuracy for use in child care interventions.
- The instrument is recommended for researchers and practitioners focused on healthy weight initiatives in child care.
- For outcome measurement assessing intervention impact, more objective and less subjective measures may be preferable.
Background:
Few assessment instruments have examined the nutrition and physical activity environments in child care, and none are self-administered. Given the emerging focus on child care settings as a target for intervention, a valid and reliable measure of the nutrition and physical activity environment is needed.
Methods:
To measure inter-rater reliability, 59 child care center directors and 109 staff completed the self-assessment concurrently, but independently. Three weeks later, a repeat self-assessment was completed by a sub-sample of 38 directors to assess test-retest reliability. To assess criterion validity, a researcher-administered environmental assessment was conducted at 69 centers and was compared to a self-assessment completed by the director. A weighted kappa test statistic and percent agreement were calculated to assess agreement for each question on the self-assessment.
Results:
For inter-rater reliability, kappa statistics ranged from 0.20 to 1.00 across all questions. Test-retest reliability of the self-assessment yielded kappa statistics that ranged from 0.07 to 1.00. The inter-quartile kappa statistic ranges for inter-rater and test-retest reliability were 0.45 to 0.63 and 0.27 to 0.45, respectively. When percent agreement was calculated, questions ranged from 52.6% to 100% for inter-rater reliability and 34.3% to 100% for test-retest reliability. Kappa statistics for validity ranged from -0.01 to 0.79, with an inter-quartile range of 0.08 to 0.34. Percent agreement for validity ranged from 12.9% to 93.7%.
Conclusion:
This study provides estimates of criterion validity, inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability for an environmental nutrition and physical activity self-assessment instrument for child care. Results indicate that the self-assessment is a stable and reasonably accurate instrument for use with child care interventions. We therefore recommend the Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) instrument to researchers and practitioners interested in conducting healthy weight intervention in child care. However, a more robust, less subjective measure would be more appropriate for researchers seeking an outcome measure to assess intervention impact.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Sources of Self-Esteem I: Family Experience
Self-Schemas
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Reliability and Validity
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
