Efficient intermediate fine mapping: confidence set inference with likelihood ratio test statistic
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7281, USA.
Abstract:
In positional cloning of disease causing genes, identification of a linked chromosomal region via linkage studies is often followed by fine mapping via association studies. Efficiency can be gained with an intermediate step where confidence regions for the locations of disease genes are constructed. The confidence set inference [CSI; Papachristou and Lin, 2006b] achieves this goal by replacing the traditional null hypothesis of no linkage with a new set of null hypotheses where the chromosomal position under consideration is in tight linkage with a trait locus. This approach was shown to perform favorably compared with several competing methods. Using the duality of confidence sets and hypothesis testing, CSI was proposed for the Mean test statistics with affected sibling pair data (CSI-Mean). We postulate that more efficient confidence sets will result if more efficient test statistics are used in the CSI framework. One promising candidate, the maximum LOD score (MLS) statistic, makes maximum use of available identity by descent information, in addition to handling markers with incomplete polymorphism naturally. We propose a procedure that tests the CSI null hypotheses using the MLS statistic (CSI-MLS). Compared with CSI-Mean, CSI-MLS provides tighter confidence regions over a range of single and two-locus disease models. The MLS test is also shown to be more powerful than the Mean test in testing the CSI null over a wide range of disease models, the advantage being most pronounced for recessive models. In addition, CSI-MLS is computationally much more efficient than CSI-Mean.
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Intervals
A confidence...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Coefficient
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...
