Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The contested Jacksonian legacy.

Stephen Jacyna1

  • 1Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine, University College, London, UK. s.jacyna@ucl.ac.uk

Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
|July 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Culture and health.

Lancet (London, England)·2014
Same author

The most important of all the organs: Darwin on the brain.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2009
Same author

Freud's critical study.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2005
Same author

Jean-Martin Charcot's mechanisms of language.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2005
Same author

Historical keywords: Nerve.

Lancet (London, England)·2005
Same author

Lichtheim's "house".

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2004

John Hughlings Jackson

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • History of Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • John Hughlings Jackson was a prominent figure in British neurology.
  • Henry Head and Samuel Alexander Kinnier Wilson were key disciples of Jackson.
  • Both Head and Wilson shared professional similarities and attitudes.

Discussion:

  • This abstract explores the divergent interpretations of Jacksonian neurology by his prominent followers.
  • It highlights how Jackson's legacy was contested among his disciples.
  • The differing views of Head and Wilson exemplify the subjective nature of interpreting influential scientific legacies.

Key Insights:

  • The legacy of John Hughlings Jackson was not monolithic.
  • Henry Head and S.A. Kinnier Wilson offered distinct perspectives on Jackson's work.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interpretation and contestation are inherent in the evolution of scientific thought.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research could explore other disciples' interpretations of Jackson's work.
    • Understanding these historical interpretations can inform contemporary neurological discourse.
    • This analysis provides a framework for examining the legacy of influential scientists.