Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone
Mohammed Qahash1, W Ross Hardwick, Michael D Rohrer
1Laboratory for Applied Periodontal & Craniofacial Regeneration, Medical College of Georgia, School of Dentistry, Augusta, Georgia 30912, USA.
Purpose:
The influence of surface modifications on osseointegration in newly formed bone is not well established. The purpose of this study was to compare osseointegration at acid-etched versus turned implants in newly formed and native bone.
Methods:
Supra-alveolar peri-implant defects were created in 8 hound/Labrador mongrel dogs. Titanium implants 10 mm long (2 turned and 1 dual acid-etched) were placed 5 mm into the surgically reduced alveolar crest, creating 5-mm supra-alveolar peri-implant defects. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2; 0.4 mg) in a collagen carrier was used to induce new bone formation. A macroporous, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene device was used to delineate new bone formation. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks for histometric analysis of the experimental sites.
Results:
There were no significant differences in rhBMP-2-induced bone density (mean +/- SD) at acid-etched versus turned implants (20.6% +/- 5.3% vs 23.8% +/- 4.7%; P = .232). However, there was a significant difference in bone-implant contact in favor of the acid-etched implants (12.3% +/- 6.8% vs 7.9% +/- 3.1%; P = .05). Native bone density averaged 63.9% +/- 7.5% and 64.5% +/- 9.0% for acid-etched and turned implants, respectively (P = .641). Nevertheless, bone-implant contact was significantly enhanced at acid-etched versus turned implants (59.7% +/- 11.3% vs 40.7% +/-21.2%; P =.005).
Conclusions:
Surface dual acid-etching of titanium implants has a positive effect on osseointegration in newly formed and native bone. Significant differences in bone density do not appear to influence this effect.
More Related Videos
12:19Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
Published on: July 1, 2013
03:10Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025