Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal spending functions for asymmetric group sequential designs.

Keaven M Anderson1

  • 1Merck Research Laboratories, UG1C-46, 351 Sumneytown Pike, Upper Gwynedd, PA 19454-2505, USA. keaven_anderson@merck.com

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|July 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prior Effective Sample Size When Borrowing on the Treatment Effect Scale.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Adjusted Inference for Multiple Testing Procedure in Group-Sequential Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2024
Same author

Exploratory subgroup identification in the heterogeneous Cox model: A relatively simple procedure.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

The MaxCombo Test Severely Violates the Type I Error Rate-Reply.

JAMA oncology·2023
Same author

Log-Rank Test vs MaxCombo and Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time Tests for Comparing Survival Under Nonproportional Hazards in Immuno-oncology Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

JAMA oncology·2022
Same author

A unified framework for weighted parametric group sequential design.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2022
Same journal

Comparison of Different Methods for the Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies-A Simulation Study.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces optimized group sequential designs for statistical testing. Minimizing the squared sample size, rather than the sample size itself, yields better interim stopping rules and smaller maximum sample sizes.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Group sequential designs are crucial for adaptive clinical trials, allowing early stopping for efficacy or futility.
  • Optimizing these designs involves balancing Type I and Type II error rates with sample size efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present optimized group sequential designs for testing a single parameter.
  • To explore the impact of minimizing squared sample size versus sample size on design characteristics.
  • To compare designs based on standard spending functions with fully optimized designs.

Main Methods:

  • Specification of a loss function and a prior distribution for the parameter of interest.
  • Pre-specification of Type I and Type II error rates.
  • Minimization of expected sample size over the prior distribution.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of designs using Hwang-Shih-DeCani and Kim-DeMets spending functions against fully optimized designs.

    • Main Results:

    • Minimizing the squared sample size results in less aggressive interim stopping rules and smaller maximum sample sizes, with similar expected sample sizes.
    • Fully optimized designs may offer advantages over those restricted by specific spending function families.
    • The benefit of including an interim analysis was examined in selected examples.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimized group sequential designs, particularly those minimizing squared sample size, offer practical advantages in terms of stopping rules and maximum sample size.
    • The study provides generally useful optimal asymmetric spending function designs for achieving minimal expected sample size.
    • These findings are applicable to statistical testing scenarios where efficient adaptive designs are desired.