Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A posterior tale.

Edward L Korn1, Boris Freidlin

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, EPN-8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7434, USA. korne@ctep.nci.nih.gov

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|July 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changing standard of care during a randomized trial: examples, considerations and guidelines.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

A note on rank-preserving structural failure time models to account for crossover.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Evaluating the impact of stratification on the power and cross-arm balance of randomized phase 2 clinical trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025
Same author

Accrual Suspensions in Seamless Phase II/III Trials: A Review of NRG Oncology Trials.

JCO oncology advances·2025
Same author

Phase III Evaluation of Treatment Combinations in Three-Arm Trials.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2024
Same author

Two-to-One Randomization: Rarely Advisable.

JCO oncology practice·2024
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Multiple Test Procedures Controlling False Discovery Rate With Auxiliary Variable and Their Application to Set4 <math><semantics><mi>Δ</mi> <annotation>$\Delta$</annotation></semantics></math> Mutant Data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

The Univariate Distribution of Hierarchical Composite Endpoints and the Condorcet Non-transitivity Paradox.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

The posterior distribution may not always provide all necessary information for parameter inference. This study resolves this paradox and discusses its implications for clinical trial data monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology

Background:

  • The posterior distribution is a cornerstone of Bayesian inference, theoretically encapsulating all information about a parameter after observing data.
  • Challenges arise in practice, particularly in sequential analysis and adaptive trial designs, where decisions are made based on accumulating evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address a conceptual issue where the posterior distribution might seem insufficient for complete inference.
  • To resolve the apparent paradox by clarifying the role and limitations of the posterior distribution in specific inferential contexts.
  • To connect these theoretical insights to practical challenges in the data monitoring of clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Presentation of a statistical vignette illustrating the apparent paradox.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical discussion and resolution of the paradox using principles of Bayesian statistics.
  • Exploration of the implications through the lens of clinical trial data monitoring and sequential analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • The resolution hinges on recognizing that the posterior distribution, while complete for a fixed dataset, may not encompass all information needed for sequential decision-making or future predictions.
    • The apparent paradox is resolved by distinguishing between inference on a fixed parameter and the ongoing inferential process in adaptive settings.
    • The findings highlight the importance of considering the inferential goal and the dynamic nature of data in clinical trials.

    Conclusions:

    • The posterior distribution is essential but not always sufficient on its own for all aspects of inference, especially in dynamic settings like clinical trial monitoring.
    • Understanding the limitations of the posterior distribution is crucial for robust decision-making in adaptive clinical trial designs.
    • This work provides a clearer framework for interpreting Bayesian inference in the context of real-world data monitoring challenges.