Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating causal effects from observational data with a model for multiple bias.

Michael Höfler1, Roselind Lieb, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

  • 1Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Strasse 46a, 01187 Dresden, Germany. hoefler@psychologie.tu-dresden.de

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
|July 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain Aging in Specific Phobia: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

From Expectation to Learning: A Mediational Model of Exposure Therapy Outcome in Anxiety Disorders.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2026
Same author

Utilization of different types of safety behavior during exposure-based CBT for anxiety disorders and its correlates.

Cognitive behaviour therapy·2026
Same author

Sustainability of Treatment Success 5 Years after Exposure-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2025
Same author

Joy beyond fear: Positive emotions after exposure in patients with anxiety disorders and their link to threat expectancy and treatment outcome.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025
Same author

Same same but different: Threat expectancy change and fear reduction as readouts of exposure rationales are only weakly associated and contribute differentially to treatment outcome in anxiety disorders.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) may increase depression risk, but bias adjustments reveal greater uncertainty. Even with adjustments, the probability of SAD increasing depression risk remains high, highlighting the need for better diagnostic tools.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Observational data analysis can be biased by confounding, sampling, and measurement errors.
  • Uncertainty in bias parameters, like misclassification, can lead to overly narrow interval estimates.
  • Estimating causal effects requires accounting for potential biases in epidemiological studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the causal effect of social anxiety disorder (SAD) on subsequent depression.
  • To apply a multiple bias adjustment method to observational data.
  • To assess the impact of bias on the association between SAD and depression.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a multiple bias adjustment method and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis.
  • Applied the method to data from the Early Developmental Stages of Psychiatry (EDSP) study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeled bias from confounding, sampling, and measurement errors.

    • Main Results:

    • Conventional analysis showed an elevated depression risk in older individuals with SAD (OR = 3.06, 95% CI 1.64-5.70).
    • The bias-adjusted estimate for depression risk associated with SAD was 2.01 (95% CI 0.61-9.71).
    • The probability that SAD increases depression risk (OR > 1) was estimated at 88.6% after bias adjustment.

    Conclusions:

    • Bias adjustment introduces greater uncertainty but provides a more realistic estimate of the SAD-depression link.
    • The study underscores the importance of understanding and modeling bias in observational research.
    • There is a need for larger validation studies of mental disorder diagnostic instruments.