Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.

Todd R Jenkins1, C Y Liu

  • 1Chattanooga Women's Laser Center, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421, USA. tjenkins92602@yahoo.com

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|July 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Risk factors analysis of systemic adverse reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy for dust mites in children with respiratory allergic diseases].

Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

[Variant frequency of <i>GJB2</i> c.109G>A (p.Val37Ile) in Chinese patients with hearing loss: a systematic review and Meta-analysis].

Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery·2026
Same author

[Construction of learning curves for digital impression and their application in prosthodontic education].

Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology·2026
Same author

[Gender differences in comorbidity characteristics among patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2026
Same author

[Analysis of clinical characteristics and factors associated with mortality in hematological patients infected with <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of supervised multilevel oropharyngeal rehabilitation via videoconference on tongue function and apnea severity in obstructive sleep apnea: Quasi-experimental study.

Rehabilitacion·2026
Same journal

Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in group prenatal care research.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Complex benign gynecology in perimenopause: current evidence and future directions.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Role of insulin in female reproduction.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Urinary tract involvement in endometriosis: current evidence and clinical insights into navigating diagnosis and management.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in ultrasound imaging of adenomyosis and clinical impacts.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is effective for stress urinary incontinence, showing similar results to open surgery. However, tension-free slings may offer better objective cure rates.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Gynecology
  • Pelvic Floor Surgery

Background:

  • Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) significantly impacts women's quality of life.
  • Surgical interventions aim to restore urethral support and improve continence.
  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is a well-established procedure for SUI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent literature on laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
  • To compare its efficacy with open Burch colposuspension and tension-free slings.
  • To evaluate factors influencing surgical success.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of recent randomized trials and prospective cohorts.
  • Analysis of subjective and objective cure rates.
  • Comparison of different surgical techniques and materials.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension demonstrates equivalent subjective cure rates to open Burch colposuspension.
  • Objective cure rates for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension may be lower than open surgery.
  • Recent trials show no significant difference between laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free slings in subjective cure rates, but objective rates favor slings.
  • One study indicated laparoscopic Burch colposuspension with mesh and staples was inferior to sutures.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is an effective SUI treatment, comparable to open surgery.
  • Surgeon experience and technique are crucial for successful outcomes.
  • While subjective cure rates are similar to tension-free slings, objective rates favor slings.
  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is recommended for specific patient groups to avoid mesh complications, but further comparative research is needed.