Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026
03:43
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
Fiona Reid1, Anthony R B Smith
1Locum Consultant Urogynaecologist, The Warrell Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|July 13, 2007
Summary
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension offers similar clinical outcomes for stress urinary incontinence as the open approach. This review confirms level 1 evidence supporting both surgical methods.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Gynecology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition affecting women.
- Colposuspension is a surgical treatment for SUI.
- Advancements in minimally invasive techniques have led to comparisons with traditional open surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent research comparing laparoscopic and open colposuspension.
- To evaluate the role of colposuspension amidst evolving minimally invasive SUI procedures.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of recently published research.
- Analysis of two large multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 2006.
- Comparison of objective and subjective cure rates for SUI.
Main Results:
- Two RCTs (Carey et al., Kitchener et al.) compared open and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
- No significant differences in objective or subjective SUI cure rates were found at 24 months.
- Both methods demonstrated comparable outcomes for treating stress urinary incontinence.
Conclusions:
- Level 1 evidence supports the equivalence of laparoscopic and open Burch colposuspension.
- Laparoscopic colposuspension is a viable alternative to open surgery for SUI.
- The findings are crucial for surgical decision-making in SUI management.
