Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robotic].

Felipe Cáceres1, Carlos Sánchez, Luis Martínez-Piñeiro

  • 1Servicio de Urologia, Hospital General La Paz, Paseo Castellana, 261 U 28045 Madrid, España.

Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
|July 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiscale stochastic modeling for calcium dynamics in cardiac electrophysiology: assessing whole-cell model reliability under phosphorylation and LCC downregulation.

Frontiers in network physiology·2026
Same author

Dual-range colorimetric protein quantification in whey and WPC using a smart polymeric film and RGB imaging.

Food chemistry·2026
Same author

Targeting claudins in gastric cancer: A novel GLOWing strategy in the SPOTLIGHT.

Cancer treatment reviews·2026
Same author

Impact of surgical approach on gastric cancer surgery based on textbook outcome: Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery-A retrospective cohort study.

Surgery·2026
Same author

Mean Platelet Volume in the Differential Diagnosis Between Kawasaki Disease and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Real-time prediction of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus epidemics in primary care using the Gompertz model.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Bladder Foreign Body of Gastrointestinal Origin: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography Combined With MRI-Ultrasound Cognitive Fusion Targeted Biopsy for Repeat Prostate Biopsy.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Evaluating a DeepSeek-Based Case-Based Learning Approach for Teaching the Emergency Management of Urosepsis to Nursing Students.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Association of Fibrosis-Related Gene Expression Profiles in Benign Ureteral Stricture Tissue With Restenosis After Ureteroplasty.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Retrospective Comparison of Transurethral Prostatic Columnar Water Balloon Dilation and Pharmacotherapy for Moderate-to-Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Efficacy, Safety and Compliance.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Analysis of the Effect of Stepwise Refined Nursing on the Severity of Ureteral Stent-Related Symptom Clusters After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
See all related articles

Robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) offer comparable intraoperative and postoperative benefits for localized prostate cancer. RRP features a shorter learning curve, but LRP is more cost-effective.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Urologic Oncology
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery is a viable alternative to conventional treatment for localized prostate cancer.
  • Robotic surgery presents another therapeutic option for prostate cancer management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP).
  • To analyze key parameters including oncological and functional outcomes, blood loss, and costs.

Main Methods:

  • A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify relevant studies on LRP and RRP.
  • Key parameters such as oncological results, functional outcomes, blood loss, operative time, complications, learning curve, and cost were analyzed.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both LRP and RRP offer minimally invasive advantages with comparable complication rates.
  • Robotic prostatectomy has a shorter learning curve (10-20 cases) versus LRP (50-60 cases).
  • LRP is more cost-effective than RRP, with lower instrument expenditure and no robot acquisition/maintenance costs.

Conclusions:

  • Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes are similar for both LRP and RRP.
  • Robotic prostatectomy demonstrates a faster learning curve.
  • Further prospective studies are needed to compare long-term oncological and functional results; LRP is more cost-effective.