Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Shape discrimination for motion-defined and contrast-defined form: squareness in special.

D Regan1, S Hamstra

  • 1Department of Psychology, York University, Ontario, Canada.

Perception
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Human shape discrimination is as accurate for motion-defined as for contrast-defined targets at high speeds. However, motion-defined shape perception fails at low speeds, unlike contrast-defined vision.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

Journal of histotechnology·2021
Same author

Immune regulation of canine tumour and macrophage PD-L1 expression.

Veterinary and comparative oncology·2016
Same author

Oral and anal sex are key to sustaining gonorrhoea at endemic levels in MSM populations: a mathematical model.

Sexually transmitted infections·2015
Same author

Head and neck cancer in Australia between 1982 and 2005 show increasing incidence of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers.

British journal of cancer·2011
Same author

Some early uses of evoked brain responses in investigations of human visual function.

Vision research·2008
Same author

Ethnically mismatched cord blood transplants in African Americans: the Saint Louis Cord Blood Bank experience.

Cytotherapy·2007

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The human visual system can perceive shapes defined by motion cues or luminance contrast.
  • Understanding how these different visual cues are processed and integrated is crucial for understanding visual perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare shape discrimination abilities for motion-defined (MD) and contrast-defined (CD) rectangular targets.
  • To investigate the influence of dot speed and luminance contrast on shape discrimination thresholds.
  • To explore the potential shared mechanisms in the visual system for processing MD and CD shapes.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects discriminated the aspect ratios of camouflaged rectangular targets defined by relative dot motion or luminance contrast.
  • Target area was varied independently of aspect ratio to disconfound shape from size discrimination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Dot speed and luminance contrast were systematically manipulated.

    • Main Results:

    • Shape discrimination thresholds were comparable for MD and CD targets at high dot speeds and contrast.
    • Discrimination of MD targets significantly degraded and failed at low dot speeds (below 0.03-0.08 deg s-1).
    • Discrimination of CD targets remained largely unaffected by dot speed, and thresholds increased with target asymmetry.

    Conclusions:

    • The visual system exhibits robust shape discrimination for both MD and CD targets under optimal conditions.
    • Motion-based shape perception is highly dependent on stimulus speed, unlike contrast-based perception.
    • Shared neural pathways, potentially involving the human equivalent of cortical area MT, may contribute to shape discrimination of MD forms.