Iatrogenic ureteral lesions and repair: a review for gynecologists
Carlo De Cicco1, Maria Lorena Ret Dávalos, Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. carlodecicco@tim.it
Abstract:
Ureter injuries are a well-known complication of gynecologic surgery and a frequent cause of medicolegal problems. Because there are no randomized, controlled trials and the available studies are small series and case reports, the evidence on which to base treatment is weak. We therefore reviewed the complete English-language literature of ureter repair since 1990. In total, 608 ureter injuries were reported. Although it is widely believed that for laceration or section the prognosis is affected by a delay in diagnosis, we could not find evidence to substantiate this. An obstruction requires stenting only. For a laceration, stenting with suturing was more effective than stenting only (p = .006). A ureter anastomosis was successful in over 94% of cases either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. In conclusion, the literature data are scanty and heterogeneous and do not permit solid conclusions. Evidence, however, is emerging that a laceration should be treated by stenting and suturing. A ureter anastomosis over a stent could become a valid option especially when performed by laparoscopy.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
