Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

06:48
Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children's diet? A non-randomised controlled trial
J K Ransley1, D C Greenwood, J E Cade
1Nutritional Epidemiology Group, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, 30-32 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LN, United Kingdom. j.k.ransley@leeds.ac.uk
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
|July 17, 2007
Summary
The School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme (SFVS) increased fruit intake in young children. However, this effect diminished over time and did not impact vegetable consumption or overall nutrient intake significantly.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Nutrition
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Dietary Interventions
Background:
- Childhood obesity and poor dietary habits are significant public health concerns.
- School-based interventions are a key strategy for promoting healthy eating in children.
- The School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme (SFVS) aimed to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among pupils.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the dietary impact of the School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme (SFVS).
- To assess changes in fruit and vegetable intake and nutrient consumption among young children participating in the SFVS.
Main Methods:
- A non-randomised controlled trial involving 3,703 children aged 4-6 years in infant and primary schools.
- Intervention involved providing one portion of fruit or vegetable daily to children.
- Dietary intake, including fruit, vegetables, and key nutrients, was measured.
Main Results:
- The SFVS was associated with a significant increase in fruit intake at three months for reception and year 1 pupils.
- This positive effect on fruit intake decreased by seven months and returned to baseline when children were no longer eligible for the scheme.
- No significant changes in vegetable consumption or overall intake of energy, fat, or salt were observed; minor increases in carotene and vitamin C were noted.
Conclusions:
- The SFVS effectively promoted increased fruit consumption in the short term.
- The scheme's impact on fruit intake diminished over time and was dependent on continued participation.
- The overall impact on vegetable intake and broader nutrient profiles was limited.
Related Concept Videos
What is an Experiment?
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Correlations
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

