Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

An Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer Metastasis
Published on: September 18, 2013
Chromogranin A expression in patients with hormone naïve prostate cancer predicts the development of hormone
Alfredo Berruti1, Alessandra Mosca, Francesco Porpiglia
1Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical & Biological Sciences, University of Turin and San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Torino, Italy. alfredo.berruti@gmail.com
Purpose:
We assessed chromogranin A as a tissue biomarker in prostate needle biopsies or as a plasma biomarker, a risk factor for hormone refractory prostate cancer.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 211 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer treated with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogues constituted the study cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the predictive role of tissue and plasma chromogranin A expression.
Results:
Chromogranin A expression in less than 30% or in 30% or more tumor cells was significantly associated with a shorter time to hormone refractory disease on univariate analysis (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1 and HR 6.0, 95% CI 2.7-12.9), or on multivariate analysis after adjusting for Gleason score, serum prostate specific antigen and disease stage (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8 and HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-9.0), respectively. Plasma chromogranin A measured at baseline (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.8-5.2), and after 1 year (HR 5.8, 95% CI 3.1-10.1) and 2 years (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.6), was predictive of hormone refractory risk confirming the tissue results. Plasma as well as tissue chromogranin A expression negatively correlated with overall survival.
Conclusions:
Chromogranin A expression in prostate cancer biopsies is an independent predictive factor of hormone refractory disease in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer on early androgen deprivation therapy. Plasma chromogranin A is also a reliable predictive marker and the predictive significance is maintained over time. These results deserve validation in another data set.
