Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

A Biomimetic Model for Liver Cancer to Study Tumor-Stroma Interactions in a 3D Environment with Tunable Bio-Physical Properties
Published on: August 7, 2020
Comparison of mode of action of four hepatocarcinogens: a model-based approach
Jutta Groos1, Peter Bannasch, Michael Schwarz
1Central Unit Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract:
Within the scope of the Rat Liver Foci Bioassay the model carcinogens N-nitrosomorpholine (NNM), 2-acetylaminoflouren (2-AAF), phenobarbital (PB), and clofibrate (CF) were analyzed concerning their potency and dose-response relationship to induce foci of altered hepatocytes (FAHs), which are known to be precursor lesions of liver adenoma and carcinoma. The medium-term experiment follows an initiation-promotion protocol using diethylnitrosamine (DEN) as initiator. The present report deals with the application of two biologically based models for hepatocarcinogenesis, the two-stage clonal expansion model (TSCEM), and a color-shift model with beta distributed growth rates (CSMbeta). Both models yield similar conclusions concerning the mode of action of the carcinogens. However, the fit of CSMbeta appears closer to the observations than the fit of TSCEM. The analysis shows that application of a single dose of DEN has a persistent effect on the rate of FAH induction, especially in female rats. Overall, striking differences in the effect of the carcinogens were observed between male and female animals. 2-AAF shows a strong promoting effect in males, whereas in females the initiating effect dominates. NNM has both initiating and promoting effect, but in females, the rate of FAH formation seems to reach saturation at high dose. In the doses applied in the present experiment, PB has the weakest carcinogenic effect. Although PB alone does not induce FAH during the observation period, it increases the rate of FAH formation when applied following initiation with DEN. CF reduces the number and area fraction of GSTP-stained FAH, probably because it suppresses the placental form of glutathione S-transferase-positive phenotype.
Insights
This study analyzed carcinogen potency in rats, finding that models of hepatocarcinogenesis showed similar conclusions, with the color-shift model fitting observations best. Sex-based differences in carcinogen effects were significant.
Area of Science:
- Hepatocarcinogenesis research
- Toxicology and chemical carcinogenesis
- Biologically based mathematical modeling
Background:
- Foci of altered hepatocytes (FAHs) are precursor lesions for liver adenoma and carcinoma.
- Understanding carcinogen potency and dose-response is crucial for risk assessment.
- Medium-term bioassays provide insights into carcinogenesis mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the potency and dose-response of model carcinogens (NNM, 2-AAF, PB, CF) in inducing FAHs.
- To apply and compare two biologically based models: two-stage clonal expansion model (TSCEM) and color-shift model (CSMbeta).
- To investigate sex-specific differences in carcinogen effects on hepatocarcinogenesis.
Main Methods:
- Rat Liver Foci Bioassay using an initiation-promotion protocol with diethylnitrosamine (DEN).
- Application of TSCEM and CSMbeta for analyzing hepatocarcinogenesis.
- Analysis of dose-response relationships and sex-specific effects of carcinogens.
Main Results:
- Both TSCEM and CSMbeta models yielded similar conclusions on carcinogen action, with CSMbeta showing a closer fit.
- A single DEN dose had a persistent effect on FAH induction, particularly in female rats.
- Significant sex differences observed: 2-AAF promoted in males, initiated in females; NNM showed dose saturation in females; PB had the weakest effect but enhanced DEN-initiated FAHs; CF reduced GSTP-stained FAHs.
Conclusions:
- Biologically based models are valuable for understanding carcinogen mechanisms in hepatocarcinogenesis.
- Carcinogen effects on FAH induction are complex and exhibit significant sex-specific variations.
- CSMbeta model demonstrated a superior fit to experimental data compared to TSCEM.

