Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of different surgical treatments for management of anal fistula: a network meta-analysis.

Techniques in coloproctology·2023
Same author

A colorectal cancer missed by colon capsule endoscopy: a case report.

BMC gastroenterology·2022
Same author

Author response to: Comment on: Novel chyme reinfusion device for gastrointestinal fistulas and stomas: feasibility study.

The British journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Novel chyme reinfusion device for gastrointestinal fistulas and stomas: feasibility study.

The British journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Network meta-analysis of local and regional analgesia following colorectal resection.

The British journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Diverticular disease epidemiology: acute hospitalisations are growing fastest in young men.

Techniques in coloproctology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

P Y G Choy, I P Bissett, J G Docherty

    The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    |July 20, 2007
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Stapled ileocolic anastomosis significantly reduces the risk of anastomotic leaks compared to handsewn techniques. This systematic review highlights stapling as a safer option for ileocolic reconstruction, particularly in cancer patients.

    More Related Videos

    The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
    07:51

    The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage

    Published on: November 4, 2010

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

    An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
    09:40

    An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

    Published on: April 17, 2020

    The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
    07:51

    The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage

    Published on: November 4, 2010

    Area of Science:

    • Gastroenterology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Colorectal Surgery

    Background:

    • Ileocolic anastomoses are crucial for right-sided colon cancer and Crohn's disease.
    • Surgical techniques include linear cutter staplers and suturing.
    • Previous trials lacked power to detect small differences in complication rates.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare outcomes of stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomoses.
    • To determine if stapling reduces complications.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1970-2005).
    • Searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and society meeting abstracts.
    • Included 6 trials with 955 participants; subgroup analysis for cancer patients.

    Main Results:

    • Stapled anastomosis showed significantly fewer anastomotic leaks (OR 0.34; p=0.02).
    • In cancer patients, stapled anastomosis also led to fewer leaks (OR 0.28; p=0.01).
    • No significant differences in stricture, hemorrhage, operative time, re-operation, mortality, or length of stay.

    Conclusions:

    • Stapled functional end-to-end ileocolic anastomosis is associated with fewer leaks than handsewn techniques.
    • Stapling offers a potentially safer method for ileocolic reconstruction.