Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity
A G Fahey1, M M Schutz, D L Lofgren
1Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. agfahey@purdue.edu
Heteroscedasticity in dairy herd data can bias genetic evaluations. This study found that addressing this data issue had minimal impact on genetic parameter estimates and genotype-by-environment interaction in grazing versus confinement systems.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics
- Dairy Science
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Grazing (G) offers an alternative dairy production system to confinement (C).
- Heteroscedasticity (HV), or unequal variances, in yield data can bias genetic correlation estimates, potentially masking genotype-by-environment interactions (GxE).
- Accurate genetic evaluation requires understanding how HV affects heritabilities and genetic correlations between management systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of HV on heritability and genetic correlation estimates for milk, protein, and fat yield, and somatic cell scores.
- To determine if HV influences the accuracy of sire's predicted transmitting ability (PTA) in predicting daughter performance in G and C herds.
- To assess the presence of GxE between G and C systems under varying levels of HV.
Main Methods:
- Utilized large datasets from 366 G herds and 373 C herds, comprising 72,489 and 117,629 records, respectively.
- Divided herds into variance quartiles (Q(V)1-Q(V)4) based on milk yield.
- Applied a transformation to reduce HV by standardizing within-herd standard deviations, similar to USDA-DHIA methods.
- Analyzed daughter yield regressions on sire PTA and estimated heritabilities and genetic correlations between G and C systems.
Main Results:
- PTA overestimated daughter production in most variance quartiles for both G and C herds, with varying degrees by trait.
- Reducing HV had minimal effect on G herds but improved PTA accuracy in lower variance quartiles of C herds.
- Heritabilities for milk, protein, and fat yields were similar across G and C herds (approx. 0.16-0.21).
- Genetic correlations between C and G systems did not indicate significant GxE, except for a possible interaction in the lowest variance quartile.
Conclusions:
- Heteroscedasticity in dairy production data has a limited impact on heritability and genetic correlation estimates between grazing and confinement systems.
- The evidence for genotype-by-environment interaction between these systems is modest and does not appear to stem solely from heteroscedasticity.
- While PTA accuracy can be affected by HV, particularly in confinement herds, the overall genetic architecture of yield traits is consistent across management systems.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Gene-Environment Interactions
Heritability
Epistasis Analysis
Multiple Allele Traits
Multiple Allele Traits

