Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology01:59

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

Crop cultivation has a long history in human civilization, with records showing the cultivation of cereal plants beginning at around 8000 BC. This early plant breeding was developed primarily to provide a steady supply of food.
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

Overview
Recombinant DNA01:09

Recombinant DNA

Overview
Transgenic Plants02:50

Transgenic Plants

Recombinant DNA technology called transgenesis is often used to add a foreign gene or remove a detrimental gene from an organism. Such genetically modified organisms are called transgenic organisms.
The first-ever transgenic plant was a tobacco plant developed in 1983 that showed resistance against the tobacco mosaic virus. Since then, many transgenic plants have been developed and commercialized for improving the agricultural, ornamental, and horticultural value of a crop plant. Transgenic...
Transgenic Organisms00:53

Transgenic Organisms

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Removing politics from innovations that improve food security.

Transgenic research·2021
Same author

Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.

Transgenic research·2021
Same author

Report on the SCRA Nuts and Bolts Workshop II: case studies of citrus greening, Ultra-low Gossypol Cotton, and blight tolerant, low-acrylamide potato.

GM crops & food·2019
Same author

Rebuttal to commentary of Prof Yilmaz.

GM crops & food·2019
Same author

Rebuttal to Commentary of Prof Yilmaz.

GM crops & food·2019
Same author

A critical assessment of regulatory triggers for products of biotechnology: Product vs. process.

GM crops & food·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Bioassay-Guided Identification of Natural Products for Biocontrol by Thin Layer Chromatography-Direct Bioautography
04:52

Bioassay-Guided Identification of Natural Products for Biocontrol by Thin Layer Chromatography-Direct Bioautography

Published on: July 26, 2024

Public perceptions of biotechnology.

Alan McHughen1

  • 1Botany and Plant Science Department, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. alanmc@ucr.edu

Biotechnology Journal
|July 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Public understanding of agricultural biotechnology is low, leading to fear and misperceptions. More accurate information is needed for rational debate on its risks and benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Biotechnology
  • Public Perception

Background:

  • Public understanding of agricultural biotechnology is limited, particularly among non-scientists.
  • Fear and hostility towards biotechnology, especially in food and agriculture, are prevalent.
  • This highlights a need for accurate information to foster rational public debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current state of public knowledge on agricultural biotechnology.
  • To explore common misperceptions and logical inconsistencies in Europe and North America.
  • To examine the factors contributing to scientific illiteracy and the role of media.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of public knowledge and media portrayals.
  • Analysis of contrasting adoption approaches in Europe and North America.

More Related Videos

Quantification of the Potential Impact of Glyphosate-Based Products on Microbiomes
07:42

Quantification of the Potential Impact of Glyphosate-Based Products on Microbiomes

Published on: January 10, 2022

A Robotic Platform for High-throughput Protoplast Isolation and Transformation
10:12

A Robotic Platform for High-throughput Protoplast Isolation and Transformation

Published on: September 27, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Bioassay-Guided Identification of Natural Products for Biocontrol by Thin Layer Chromatography-Direct Bioautography
04:52

Bioassay-Guided Identification of Natural Products for Biocontrol by Thin Layer Chromatography-Direct Bioautography

Published on: July 26, 2024

Quantification of the Potential Impact of Glyphosate-Based Products on Microbiomes
07:42

Quantification of the Potential Impact of Glyphosate-Based Products on Microbiomes

Published on: January 10, 2022

A Robotic Platform for High-throughput Protoplast Isolation and Transformation
10:12

A Robotic Platform for High-throughput Protoplast Isolation and Transformation

Published on: September 27, 2016

  • Exploration of benefits and trust in advice for consumers.

    • Main Results:

    • Widespread scientific illiteracy and media perpetuation of misperceptions are significant issues.
    • Contrasting approaches to agricultural biotechnology adoption exist between Europe and North America.
    • Questions arise regarding who truly benefits from agricultural biotechnology.

    Conclusions:

    • Consumers need accessible, objective advice on complex biotechnology issues.
    • Trustworthy sources are essential for informed decision-making by the public.
    • Bridging the knowledge gap is crucial for societal acceptance and benefit from agricultural biotechnology.