Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pitfalls in assessing risks from carcinogens.

A Furst1

  • 1Institute of Chemical Biology, University of San Francisco, CA 94117-1080.

Biomedical and Environmental Sciences : BES
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of laparoscopic versus open surgery on humoral immunity in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2023
Same author

"Prophylactic" transanal irrigation (TAI) to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal resection: results at 12-month follow-up of a controlled randomized multicenter trial.

Techniques in coloproctology·2020
Same author

Randomized clinical trial of prophylactic transanal irrigation <i>versus</i> supportive therapy to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection.

BJS open·2019
Same author

[Transanal total mesorectal excision : A useful complementary method for minimally invasive surgery of rectal cancer].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2019
Same author

[Quality in coloproctology training : How is coloproctology training qualitatively integrated into the national training catalogue?]

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2019
Same author

Case of the month: What's your diagnosis?

Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde·2018
Same journal

A Nationwide Analysis of Key Environmental Determinants Shaping the Spatial Distribution of Kashin-Beck Disease in China.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2026
Same journal

PM <sub>2.5</sub> Exposure-induced Lung Injury in Mice <i>via</i> Ferroptosis.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2026
Same journal

Compound K Mitigates PM <sub>2.5</sub>-induced Premature Senescence in ARPE-19 Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells through Activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Roles of PM <sub>2.5</sub> and Its Components in Frailty: An Integration of Epidemiological and Network Toxicological Evidence.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2026
Same journal

Association of Ambient PM <sub>2.5</sub> Components with Lung Function in Adults Aged 40-89 Years: A Cross-sectional Study in China.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2026
Same journal

Histopathological Assessment Using SAF Scoring: Investigating Risk Factor Correlations with Disease Severity in MASLD Patients.

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES·2026
See all related articles

Classifying chemicals as human carcinogens requires evidence from multiple scientific disciplines, not just one. This study highlights critical pitfalls in interpreting animal bioassay data to avoid inaccurate risk assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Carcinogenesis
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Accurate classification of chemical carcinogenicity is crucial for public health.
  • Decisions require integrated evidence from epidemiology, animal bioassays, and short-term tests.
  • Interpreting animal bioassay data presents significant challenges and potential for error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and critically appraise common pitfalls in animal bioassay interpretation for carcinogenicity assessment.
  • To emphasize the need for rigorous experimental design and data evaluation.
  • To prevent overstatement of carcinogenic risk based on limited or flawed evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Review of experimental design flaws in animal carcinogenicity studies.
  • Analysis of common misinterpretations of bioassay results.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of issues related to chemical identification, administration routes, and dosage.
  • Evaluation of histopathological reporting standards.
  • Consideration of animal husbandry and short-term test limitations.

    • Main Results:

    • Many chemicals can induce tumors in rodents through experimental manipulation, questioning the validity of poorly designed studies.
    • Inadequate experimental design, inappropriate administration routes, excessive doses, and insufficient histopathology are frequent pitfalls.
    • Overlooking animal husbandry and misinterpreting limited tumor findings can lead to erroneous conclusions.
    • Short-term tests also present their own set of interpretative challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • A critical appraisal of experimental design is essential before concluding a chemical is an animal carcinogen.
    • Robust, multi-disciplinary evidence is necessary for accurate human carcinogen classification.
    • Avoiding common bioassay pitfalls is vital for reliable chemical risk assessment and regulatory decision-making.