Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metastable motion anisotropy.

A Chaudhuri1, D A Glaser

  • 1School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley.

Visual Neuroscience
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Apparent motion perception is biased, with vertical movement seen more often than horizontal. This vertical bias in visual perception may stem from how signals cross the brain's midline.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A minimal sampling, in-line spectroscopic calibration method for unstable components during ammoniation of fatty acids.

The Analyst·2025
Same author

'Post-Close' Femoral Arterial Haemostasis at Endovascular Aneurysm Repair using a Dedicated Large-Bore Vascular Closure Device: A Prospective Real-World Audit.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2023
Same author

Re: CIRSE Standards of Practice on Varicocele Embolisation.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2023
Same author

Left Ovarian Vein Varix Phlebectomy at Open Surgery.

EJVES vascular forum·2022
Same author

Improved Midterm Outcomes Using Standard Devices and EndoAnchors for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Hyperangulated Necks.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2020
Same author

Ultrasound Assisted On-Table Management of Type III Endoleak at Endovascular Repair of Isolated Giant Common Iliac Aneurysm.

EJVES short reports·2019
Same journal

Support for the efficient coding account of visual discomfort.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Visual Field Asymmetries in Responses to ON and OFF Pathway Biasing Stimuli.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Pattern reversal chromatic VEPs like onsets, are unaffected by attentional demand.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

The interaction between luminance polarity grouping and symmetry axes on the ERP responses to symmetry.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Electroretinographic responses to periodic stimuli in primates and the relevance for visual perception and for clinical studies.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Synaptotagmin-9 in mouse retina.

Visual neuroscience·2024
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Apparent motion occurs when discrete visual stimuli are presented sequentially.
  • Metastable displays, like those forming a square, can elicit motion perception along different axes.
  • Central fixation in such displays often leads to a bias towards perceiving vertical motion over horizontal motion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the anisotropic nature of apparent motion perception in metastable displays.
  • To identify the factors contributing to the observed vertical motion bias.
  • To explore the role of interhemispheric signal transmission and retinal projection zones in visual perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a metastable display with stimuli at the corners of a hypothetical square, presented sequentially.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied display parameters (e.g., rectangle aspect ratio) to equalize vertical and horizontal motion perception frequencies.
  • Manipulated fixation point location to alter visual field representation and test hypotheses about midline processing.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant bias towards perceiving vertical apparent motion over horizontal motion was observed with central fixation.
    • The ratio of vertical to horizontal display dimensions required for equal motion perception varied between observers (1.18-1.92).
    • Anisotropic effects diminished when the fixation point was offset, suggesting midline processing influences the bias. A central vertical strip (30-50 min arc) showed reduced anisotropy.

    Conclusions:

    • The vertical bias in apparent motion perception is influenced by signal transmission across the vertical midline of the brain.
    • Interhemispheric transmission delays or signal degradation may contribute to the reduced perception of horizontal motion.
    • A central visual field zone, potentially related to naso-temporal retinal overlap, may modulate this anisotropic effect in visual perception.