Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Clinical trials update from Heart Rhythm 2007 and Heart Failure 2007: CARISMA, PREPARE, DAVID II, SAVE-PACE, PROTECT
John G F Cleland1, Alison P Coletta, Ahmed Tageldien Abdellah
1Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU16 5JQ, UK.
Insights
Non-invasive tests may identify post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients benefiting from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Conservative ICD programming reduces morbidity but increases syncope risk, while atrial pacing shows promise for heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Heart failure remains a significant clinical challenge, necessitating advancements in pathophysiology understanding, prevention, and treatment strategies.
- Recent clinical trials presented at major cardiology conferences offer new insights into managing heart failure and related conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and comment on key clinical trials presented at Heart Rhythm 2007 and Heart Failure 2007.
- To discuss the implications of these trials for the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of heart failure and related arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- Review of preliminary data from multiple clinical studies presented at Heart Rhythm 2007 and Heart Failure 2007.
- Commentary on the findings related to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, pacing strategies, and pharmacological interventions.
Main Results:
- CARISMA study: Non-invasive screening may identify post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients suitable for ICD therapy.
- PREPARE study: Conservative ICD programming reduces morbidity but increases the risk of arrhythmic syncope.
- DAVID II: Atrial pacing is a potential alternative to ventricular pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and ICD indications.
- SAVE-PACE: Dual chamber minimal ventricular pacing decreased persistent atrial fibrillation in sinus node disease patients compared to conventional pacing.
- PROTECT studies (pilot): 30 mg confirmed as the dose for selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist KW-3902.
- AREA-IN-CHF: Canrenone did not improve LV volumes but showed some benefit in secondary clinical endpoints.
Conclusions:
- Emerging data suggest potential improvements in patient selection for ICDs and optimization of pacing strategies.
- Pharmacological approaches, like selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonists, require further investigation in pivotal trials.
- Ongoing research continues to refine treatment paradigms for heart failure and associated arrhythmias.
Abstract:
This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure, presented at Heart Rhythm 2007 organised by the Heart Rhythm Society which was held in Denver, USA and Heart Failure 2007 organised by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology which was held in Hamburg, Germany. Unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary data, as analyses may change in the final publication. The CARISMA study suggests that non-invasive screening tests may help to identify post-MI patients who may benefit from ICD therapy. Data from the PREPARE study show that more conservative ICD programming can reduce morbidity at the cost of an increased risk of arrhythmic syncope. DAVID II indicates that atrial pacing may be a safe alternative to ventricular back-up pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and standard indications for an ICD. The incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node disease in SAVE-PACE was reduced by dual chamber minimal ventricular pacing compared to conventional dual chamber pacing. The pilot phase of the PROTECT studies confirmed 30 mg as the dose of the selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist KW-3902 to be used in pivotal studies. AREA-IN-CHF failed to show a beneficial effect of canrenone on LV volumes compared to placebo however some beneficial effects on secondary clinical endpoints were observed.
More Related Videos
10:05Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents